Abstract
This is a story of constitutional imprudence caused by political short-termism that unfortunately resulted in predictable damages to the working of the Canadian Federation. It is the sad chronicle of a series of government decisions that do not reflect what is to be expected from true statesmanship. I will first address the formal process that lead to the nomination of Justice Nadon to the Supreme Court of Canada. I will then turn to the challenges to Justice Nadon’s appointment, Parliament's attempt at modifying the Supreme Court Act without following constitutional amendment procedures and the received warnings that it not only chose to ignore, but that it actively derided. I will then examine the Supreme Court’s reference invalidating that nomination and some of the foreseeable constitutional consequences of the majority’s opinion.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.