Abstract

AbstractHere we attend to the controversy of the use of Weibull statistics for describing the strength distribution of dental brittle materials. Our approach is purely experimental by means of testing for the strength size effect, a requirement for Weibull materials. Zirconia materials of five important dental manufacturers were selected, each represented by two compositions, being one a 3 mol% Y2O3‐stabilized zirconia, and the other being a “translucent” zirconia with 4 or 5 mol% stabilizer content. Specimens of increasing sizes were fractured, whether by using a biaxial flexure test in plates or a uniaxial bending test in beams, thereby sampling different ranges of effective surfaces and volumes. A systematic deviation from the Weibull behavior over the range of 1–40 mm2 effective surface was demonstrated, regardless of manufacturer and Y2O3 content in the powder. Extensive testing using a wider range of specimen sizes narrowed down the threshold for the breakdown of the defect size distribution from the parent population to be located between 10 and 20 mm2 effective surface. A comparable behavior was confirmed for the partly sintered white‐bodies, with similar defect morphology to the fully sintered analogs, indicating a defect size distribution stemming from the pressing steps of manufacture. The defect shape related to open particle aggregate junctions, pointing to an association of their size distribution to that of the distribution of aggregate sizes in the source powders.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call