The “boston model” of managed care and spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study of the outcomes of risk-based, prepaid, managed care

Abstract

Objective: To present preliminary data on the health-related consequences for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) of participation in a prepaid, risk-based, managed care plan. Design: Baseline data from a longitudinal interview survey. Setting: Massachusetts. Participants: Subjects were 114 independently living adults with SCI recruited from 6 independent living centers and 2 managed care plans; 45 received care from a risk-based prepaid managed care plan and 69 from other sources. Main Outcomes: Self-reports of use of health services; self-assessments of health, health at interview versus 12 months earlier; hospital admissions; numbers of secondary conditions, and experiences of specific secondary conditions (eg, pressure ulcers, depression, fatigue, and chronic pain). Results: Persons in the managed care plan do not differ from their counterparts in terms of age, gender, education, level of SCI, number of comorbid conditions, activity of daily living profiles, household composition, and reliance upon health maintenance programs and routines (eg, bowel and bladder care). In terms of processes of care, they appear generally better-served. There also are a few differences in outcome that are statistically significant, or approach significance, and generally favor the managed care plan. Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest that thoughtfully and sensitively designed and implemented risk-based managed care may improve both access and outcomes.