Abstract
The main aim of the article is to compare the results obtained using three different methods of conflict analysis in a dispersed decision-making system. The conflict analysis methods, used in the article, are discussed in the paper of Ho, Hull and Srihari [6] and in the book of Black [2]. All these methods are used if the individual classifiers generate rankings of classes instead of unique class choices. The first method is the Borda count method, which is a generalization of the majority vote. The second is the intersection method, which belong to the class set reduction method. The third one is the highest rank method, which belong to the methods for class set reordering. All of these methods were used in a dispersed decision-making system which was proposed in the paper [12].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.