Abstract
The goal of the study is to understand the president´s influence and his skills in the strategic decision-making process. The qualitative nature of the study implied a participant’s observation during board meetings (with a total of 35 sports directors - 3 professionals and 32 volunteers), as well as interviewing the six board presidents of the sports associations that are part of the study. The main results revealed a poorly structured decision-making process, but with a determinant role of the board president in the conduction and manipulation of the said process. This was especially evident with the professional sports directors who showed higher knowledge and better preparation of the subjects. Likewise, both of the associations headed by full-time professional sports directors, along with an association led by a volunteer sports director (though strongly backed by the technical director of sport or sports manager during the meetings and decision-making), revealed greater strategic management and better organizational results. The main power sources of the board president, and the skills he uses in order to mark the decision’s direction are internal alliances with the closest sports director (volunteer and professional), anticipation through a previous expressed opinion, the use of information, sports expertise, and also the knowledge regarding the existent problems among the clubs and the affiliated coaches. The results found bad governance which shows confusing and poorly structured management practices. This study intents to contribute for the change of the relationship between the role of the board and the technical director of sport or sport manager (specially for the relevance of the last), in order to improve better strategic decision-making in the non-profit sport organizations.
Highlights
The positions and functions that voluntary directors and sports managers hold and carry out within sports organizations may be analyzed in the light of how the personal interests and sources of powers of these actors influence decision-making
The promiscuity of the duties and positions within the structure and strategic management are common in bad governance (HOYE, 2007; INGLIS, 1997; ROBINSON; PALMER, 2011)
At the top of the board, we identify volunteer sport directors that have the responsibility of making a strategic decision
Summary
The positions and functions that voluntary directors and sports managers hold and carry out within sports organizations may be analyzed in the light of how the personal interests and sources of powers of these actors influence decision-making. In accordance with the political model and governance in sports organizations, interests and internal alliances may constitute veritable sources of power within the boards and management of sports organizations (HEALEY, 2012; HOYE; CUSKELLY, 2003; HOYE; CUSKELLY; 2007; MINTZBERG, 1989; 1995). There are evident partnerships, contracts, agreements, groups of pressure, favors, etc. This often leads to misunderstanding concerning the role of each actor. The promiscuity of the duties and positions within the structure and strategic management are common in bad governance (HOYE, 2007; INGLIS, 1997; ROBINSON; PALMER, 2011)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
