The blame game in a child abuse incident in Vietnamese online news media: A framing analysis

Social network sites have become a primary tool for consuming and sharing news. Typically, sharing a news media article on social media involves two pieces of information: the news media frame and the individual’s commentary. With framing as an active, iterative process, we examine the extent to which individuals replicate or reframe when sharing news about climate change to Twitter. First, we conducted a framing analysis of news about climate change. Then, we assessed whether tweets sharing the news media articles in our framing analysis (n = 9,557) retained or reframed the original frame. Results show 74.64% of the tweets were not a direct replication of the original news media frame. Furthermore, the likelihood that an individual chose to reframe depended on the frame of the original article. Overall, our study illustrates how a constructionist framing approach can be applied to understand the dynamic nature of news sharing on Twitter.

Letter To the Editor: Unexplained Fractures: Child Abuse or Bone Disease: A Systematic Review

In the American political process, news discourse concerning public policy issues is carefully constructed. This occurs in part because both politicians and interest groups take an increasingly proactive approach to amplify their views of what an issue is about However, news media also play an active role in framing public policy issues. Thus, in this article, news discourse is conceived as a sociocognitive process involving all three players: sources, journalists, and audience members operating in the universe of shared culture and on the basis of socially defined roles. Framing analysis is presented as a constructivist approach to examine news discourse with the primary focus on conceptualizing news texts into empirically operationalizable dimensions—syntactical, script, thematic, and rhetorical structures—so that evidence of the news media's framing of issues in news texts may be gathered. This is considered an initial step toward analyzing the news discourse process as a whole. Finally, an extended empirical example is provided to illustrate the applications of this conceptual framework of news texts.

While a growing non-legal scholarship has begun to explore the domestic implementation of international court judgments in national law and policy, virtually no attention has been paid to their indirect effects. Yet the indirect effects are arguably far more important than the direct impact judgments can have by means of their formal implementation by state authorities. Indirect effects include the ways in which international human rights judgments may influence domestic debates in law, politics and academia, raise public consciousness, change how social actors perceive and articulate their grievances and claims, empower national rights institutions, or prompt mobilization among civil society and other rights advocates. This paper sets out an analytical framework for the Grassrootsmobilise research in its study of the indirect effects of ECtHR religion-related case law. In so doing it seeks to start filling the gap in academic research and knowledge about the indirect effects of human rights case law, specifically in the area of religion and religious freedom.

This paper aims to give description about how to use frame analysis in Public Relations
 (PR) research. The author use two framing models: Entman and Pan & Kosicki. The
 object is organization official statement about particular issue. Frame analysis method
 rarely used in Public Relations research. This methods commonly use in journalism
 study, to analyse the news in media. Meanwhile, the key word of framing is the social
 construction of reality. Organization can make social construction of realty in their
 official statement. In acacemic term, frame analysis in PR research is useful to know
 how organization positioned themselves in particular situation. Other benefit is use
 to evaluat whether the organization frame is conformable with the public opinion
 or agenda setting media or not. In practical term, frame analysis give benefit for PR
 practitioner to create the message that can be undserstood by public, also give positive
 image for organization.

Abstract: The significant and reciprocal link between Terrorism and News Media reportage was identified in the 1990s by the convergence of security and media studies (Picard, 1993). Working in the tradition of content analysis early studies examined the way Terrorism was framed in major news accounts with implications for the Huntington-Fukuyama hypothesis (Nacos, 2002). However these early studies mainly pre-dated both the War on Terror and the rise of the Internet as a major (political) news source. This paper reinvigorates this early framing research on Terrorism by examining key frames over time in online news media via software-assisted media mapping. Key frames identified in the 1990s are examined in the online news environment under the George W. Bush administration (2005) and the current Barak Hussein Obama administration (2009). The resulting news mapping allows for a comparative analysis of the way frames, such as "insurgent" have changed (if at all) over time in the most significant stories freely available online. The comparison contributes to understanding of the potential for a shift from the rhetoric of a "clash of civilizations" towards discourse networks of the "dignity of difference" by rendering visible shifts in frames associated with Terrorism that arguably are necessary for the advancement of the new paradigm.

Environmental discourse is considered as one of the essential narratives since it involves the role of women. In the gender perspective, women in environmental issues are often described as a sidekick. Farwiza Farhan is one of the environmentalists who contributes to the environmental campaign effort. The study aims to focus on the framing of Farwiza Farhan’s figure against her contribution as the keeper of the Leuser Ecosystem (KEL) on online media environmental reports. This study used the Framing Analysis approach, Environmental Journalism, and Heroism concept. The researchers chose and analyzed three news from online news media: serambinews. com as a local source; and republika. co. id and bbc. com as national sources. This research was analyzed by using Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki’s Framing Analysis method. The finding shows that the news media frames Farwiza Farhan as an environmental activist with a heroism narrative. Farwiza is portrayed as a heroic, selfless, courageous, and intelligent personality. She is adaptive and determined to deal with conflict, and she also has initiative and leadership. Heroism is perceived as an environmental perspective-journalism strategy of online news media to deliver environmental knowledge and to raise public awareness towards the environmental issue.

Institutional governance has traditionally been frequently undermined by developing countries, but this behaviour has immensely impacted economic growth and development outcome with long term implications. More fundamentally, the Nigeria oil and gas industry governance are beset with various challenges including regulatory compliance, monitoring capacity, enforcement mechanism, politics and very frequently plagued with blame games. Consequently, the study conducted primary and secondary data to problematized gaps in institutional governance from the standpoint of development discourse to establish a convergence of evidences within the context of the quality of state institutions that unarguably reflects the Nigeria scenario. Institutional and regulatory compliance gaps permeate the gamut of the oil and gas industry so resolutely in the global South like Nigeria, orchestrated by the political elites who are so perverse, rent seeking, inept and greed driven with no clear sense of patriotism compare to the global North like Norway that is more effective and nationalistic. The findings of the study highlight weaknesses in policy framework, corrupt practices, poor contract management, compromised professional integrity, inadequate funding, poor contract management and systemic gap in revenue management as a consequence of gaps in natural resources governance in the oil and gas industry in Nigeria. It explains this on the basis of existing mechanisms and empirical evidences. These evidently exemplify that Nigeria has struggled for several decades from lethargic institutional and regulatory compliance capacity as the presence of oil and gas does not translate or appear to systematically support development outcome in many developing countries.

This study aims to determine the effect of news in online media on the thoughts and behavior of a person, because the impact is very strong in shaping public opinion. This study uses theory of mass communication, news construction, netizen response, online media. The research method used quantitative descriptive analysis with online data collection techniques. Conclusion of research (1) News construction have positive effect to reporting hoax in online media, meaning that news construction which is loaded and created by online media will influence hoax news dissemination. (2) The netizen response positively affects the news of hoaxes in the online media, meaning more and more netizens respond to hoax news, hoax news will be wider. (3) News construction and netizen responses have a positive and significant influence on hoax news in media online, meaning that these two variables give a significant influence in the preaching of hoax in online media.

This research aims to find out the analysis of framing (framing/packaging) political news in online media Detik.com regarding the news of the dispute hearing of the 2024 presidential election results. To answer this problem, the framing method of the Zhongdang Pan and Gerald M Kosicki model was used. This research is included in qualitative. The data analysis used in this study was media text analysis using the framing analysis method using the Zhong Dang Pan and Gerald M. Kosicki model approach. The reserch results show that detik.com, in reporting news uses the inverted pyramid technique. Where the main topic of discussion discussed in the news is stored at the beginning of the news. In addition, there are several data obtained by news writers from the statements of sources to be used as data sources. The news structure uses 5W+1H, and the source does not throw many quotes.

IntroductionAfter succeeding Kim Jong-il upon his death on December 17, 2011, Kim Jongun, the new leader of North Korea, oversaw testing of nuclear weapons on February 12, 2013, marking North Korea's third nuclear weapon test.1 The objectives of the nuclear tests were those of regime consolidation of domestic political and military power over North Korea after increasing tension among neighborhood countries. North Korea's nuclear program, begun by Kim Il-sung, the country's founder, has been used strategically under the leadership of his son Kim Jong-il and his grandson Kim Jong-un.2 In this context, the first nuclear test in 2006 is still meaningful to the analysis of the dynamic reactions of the neighboring countries to North Korea's nuclear program.News of North Korea's first nuclear weapon test on October 9, 2006, made headlines around the globe. However, perhaps no five countries took such a keen interest in the issue as the United States, China, South Korea, Japan, and Russia- the nations involved in the six-party talks with North Korea, aimed at the negotiation of a peaceful solution. The underground explosion of the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Facility in the North Hamgyong Province of North Korea was a sensational global news media issue. This article examines how native-l anguage print media from the United States, China, South Korea, Japan, and Russia presented the news of North Korea's nuclear weapon testing to their primarily domestic audiences; the news frames employed by each; and the differences in the cross-national media coverage of this single news event. Within the frame analysis, this study used war journalism and peace journalism as two competing frames in the news coverage of the first nuclear test conducted by North Korea.Media coverage of the North Korean nuclear crisis has received little attention from media scholars. In a peripheral study of media involvement in the issue, Jiang examined cross-cultural differences in U.S. and Chinese press conferences on the test.3 However, published academic research about the news coverage of the crisis is sparse. Academic inquiry into how the U.S., Chinese, South Korean, Japanese, and Russian media relayed information about an event of great national and tional to their respective audiences as well as identifying and analyzing analyzing differences in that coverage would benefit not only mass communication scholars and framing theorists, but also those engaged in diplomatic, political, or sociological endeavors in those countries. This study will begin to fill the gap in the available analysis of news coverage of the North Korean nuclear crisis, add to the body of media framing literature, and examine how each country's native news media content may have influenced how its respective audiences understood North Korea's nuclear test.News Coverage of International IssuesStudies about international news coverage have focused on the differences in the domestic coverage of international news events such as the news media coverage on the two cases of planes being shot down, the Korean Airlines Flight 007 by the Soviet Air Force and the Iran Air Flight 655 by the U.S. Navy,4 the 1991 Persian Gulf War,5 the 1994 South African elections,6 U.N. conferences,7 and the 2003 U.S.-led invasion and occupation of Iraq.8 Other studies, though to a lesser degree, have examined cross-national and cross-cultural news coverage of various international events and issues, including the 1971 Sri Lankan uprising,9 diplomatic relations between the United States and Europe,10 the 1991 Persian Gulf War,11 the post-Cold War environment in the United States and China,12 and the Kwangju and Tiananmen pro- democracy movements.13Such cross-national and cross-cultural news analysis has only recently been thrust into the forefront of domestic mass communication research. The September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on U.S. soil demonstrated the danger of international ignorance and cross-cultural misconceptions and led to a surge in U. …

Kasus korupsi menarik untuk diteliti adalah adanya dugaan korupsi pada aliran dana Bantuan Likuiditas Bank Indonesia (BLBI). Kasus ini melibatkan dua obligor sebagai tersangka yakni Anthony salim dan Sjamsul Nursalim. Sebagai antiklimaks dari kasus ini, kedua tersangka akhirnya dibebaskan dengan alasan tidak terbukti melakukan tindak pidana korupsi dan utang kedua tersangka kepada pemerintah dianggap sudah lunas. Metode dalam penelitian ini adalah analisis framing yaitu menganalisis bagaimana dua media online yakni detikcom dan Tempo interaktif mengkonstruksikan pesan melalui berita yang disajikan terkait kasus di atas. Bingkai ( Frame ) yang dikonstruksi oleh kedua media cenderung negatif. Hal ini bisa dilihat dari elemen sintaksis, tematik, detil, maksud, bentuk kalimat, retoris/stilistik, leksikon, metafora. Judul-judul yang diambil oleh kedua media ini juga bersifat lugas seperti; Banyak Mantan Pejabat Diperiksa, Kasus BLBI Ada Kemajuan; Tak Ada Perpanjangan Waktu Lagi Bagi Penyelidikan BLBI; Kejaksaan Hentikan Penyelidikan BLBI, dan sebagainya. Kedua media tersebut berusaha memaparkan secara fair coverage dari narasumber yang disajikan namun cenderung menyudutkan hasil keputusan Kejagung Pusat bahwa kedua tersangka dinyatakan tidak bersalah karena tidak terbukti melakukan korupsi. Kedua media ini cenderung mendelegitimasi kekuasaan.

: The Srebrenica massacre was one of the defining moments in international politics in the 1990s, and the question of who was to be blamed for one of the most notorious crimes in the post-WWII world is still debated in the news media. This study uses quantitative content analysis to examine articles published in the New York Times and Washington Post using two defining moments: 1) the beginning of the Srebrenica crisis in 1993 until 1995 when the crisis escalated and the alleged massacre was committed, and 2) the period between 1995 and 2005 when the tenth anniversary commemoration sparked lively debate in the news media. News articles were examined in terms of the shift in attribution of blame. The analysis shows that the attribution of blame followed the trajectory of the official/unofficial source attribution. Findings also suggest that heavy reliance on sources can lead to the foreclosure of language, resulting in a masking of the actual events in news reporting.

Scandal frames (Political News)

In recent years a growing concern over child abuse has manifested itself in Germany. In a number of cases, the parents or guardian have failed to provide the child with adequate medical care, be it for religious or other reasons. In the discussion of such cases two aspects may be distinguished: the relationship between parent and child on the one hand, and the relationship between parent and society, as represented by the state authorities on the other. The legal discussion has focussed essentially on the latter aspect, raising the question of the circumstances under which the state authorities may invade parental rights.