Abstract

This research is an investigation of whether consciousness—one's ongoing experience—influences one's behavior and, if so, how. Analysis of the components, structure, properties, and temporal sequences of consciousness has established that, (1) contrary to one's intuitive understanding, consciousness does not have an active, executive role in determining behavior; (2) consciousness does have a biological function; and (3) consciousness is solely information in various forms. Consciousness is associated with a flexible response mechanism (FRM) for decision-making, planning, and generally responding in nonautomatic ways. The FRM generates responses by manipulating information and, to function effectively, its data input must be restricted to task-relevant information. The properties of consciousness correspond to the various input requirements of the FRM; and when important information is missing from consciousness, functions of the FRM are adversely affected; both of which indicate that consciousness is the input data to the FRM. Qualitative and quantitative information (shape, size, location, etc.) are incorporated into the input data by a qualia array of colors, sounds, and so on, which makes the input conscious. This view of the biological function of consciousness provides an explanation why we have experiences; why we have emotional and other feelings, and why their loss is associated with poor decision-making; why blindsight patients do not spontaneously initiate responses to events in their blind field; why counter-habitual actions are only possible when the intended action is in mind; and the reason for inattentional blindness.

Highlights

  • Consciousness science has been the subject of considerable research effort in recent decades, and this has led to the creation of very many theories about consciousness, but none has broad acceptance within the scientific community (Pereira et al, 2010; Katz, 2013)

  • Examples are global workspace theory (Baars, 1988, 1997), and supramodular interaction theory (Morsella, 2005). Each of these two theories includes a statement of how consciousness arises. Several of these theories refer to the biological function of consciousness, with statements ranging from the general comment that consciousness is adaptive, to statements that consciousness functions as a form of workspace with input from and output to various kinds of unconscious processing (Baars, 1997), or that its function is to produce a single representation and make it available to the parts of the brain that choose between different plans for action (Crick and Koch, 1998)

  • Perceptual switches during multistable perception appear to be automatic, and one might not expect that systems associated with planning and motor programming, which use and act upon the perceptual representations, would be involved in sensory data selection or interpretation, were it not for the fact that these operations are necessary for the flexible response mechanism (FRM), which logically must have an associated mechanism for selecting its input data

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Consciousness science has been the subject of considerable research effort in recent decades, and this has led to the creation of very many theories about consciousness, but none has broad acceptance within the scientific community (Pereira et al, 2010; Katz, 2013). Each of these two theories includes a statement of how consciousness arises Several of these theories refer to the biological function of consciousness, with statements ranging from the general comment that consciousness is adaptive, to statements that consciousness functions as a form of workspace with input from and output to various kinds of unconscious processing (Baars, 1997), or that its function is to produce a single representation and make it available to the parts of the brain that choose between different plans for action (Crick and Koch, 1998). This mechanism, the flexible response mechanism (FRM), is the source of thoughts, intentional actions, decisions, plans, daydreams, and so on

EVIDENCE THAT CONSCIOUSNESS HAS NO EXECUTIVE FUNCTION
PUBLISHED CLAIMS THAT CONSCIOUSNESS INCLUDES NO MENTAL PROCESSES
EVIDENCE THAT CONSCIOUSNESS HAS BIOLOGICAL VALUE
THE COMPLEXITY ARGUMENT THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS ADAPTIVE
EVIDENCE FROM THE CORRELATION BETWEEN CONSCIOUSNESS AND ACTUALITY
SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE THAT CONSCIOUSNESS HAS BIOLOGICAL VALUE
THE COMPONENTS OF CONSCIOUSNESS ARE ALL FORMS OF INFORMATION
INFORMATION LACKING QUALIA THAT IS EXPERIENCED
CONSCIOUSNESS IS ASSOCIATED WITH A FLEXIBLE RESPONSE MECHANISM
THE FLEXIBLE RESPONSE MECHANISM OPERATES WITH SELECTED INFORMATION
CONSCIOUSNESS IS INPUT TO THE FLEXIBLE RESPONSE MECHANISM
CENTRAL TO THE THEORY ARE THREE CLAIMS THAT MAY BE TESTABLE
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call