Abstract
We investigate the data-driven newsvendor problem when one has n observations of p features related to the demand as well as historical demand data. We propose two approaches to finding the optimal order quantity in this new setting -- Machine Learning (ML) with and without regularization, and Kernel-weights Optimization (KO). We show that the resulting Big Data newsvendor problem can be solved by LP, MIP or QCQP programs under the ML approach, and by a simple sorting algorithm under the KO approach. We justify the use of feature information by showing that not including them yields inconsistent decisions, which translates to sub-optimal costs even with infinite amount of demand data. We then derive finite-sample performance bounds on the out-of-sample costs of the feature-based decisions, which shows (i) the Big Data regime, when over-fitting dominates finite-sample bias, is defined by p > O(n^{-1/(2 8/p)}\sqrt{\log{(n)}}), and (ii) both regularized ML and KO are effective methods to handle over-fitting. Finally, we apply the feature-based algorithms for nurse staffing in a hospital emergency room using a data set from a large UK teaching hospital and find that (i) the best KO and ML algorithms beat the best practice benchmark by 23% and 24% respectively in the out-of-sample cost with statistical significance at the 5% level, and (ii) the best KO algorithm is faster than the best ML algorithm by three orders of magnitude and the best practice benchmark by two orders of magnitude.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.