Abstract
This paper investigates when firms select CEOS with STEM qualifications in order to understand the benefits to the firm of such skills. Using CEO turnover events at S&P1500 firms, we find evidence to support the hypothesis that CEOs with a STEM degree are better able to recognize and value the real options embedded in innovation expenditures and capital projects. In technology innovation literature, ambidexterity theory features prominently explaining that innovation often emerges from leadership that is capable of making decisions amidst ambiguity. We argue that real options, a financial mechanism for budgeting amidst ambiguity, are very important with innovation. They require different methods of decision making, and a CEO with a STEM background may be best able to incorporate these decision-making methods into the firm. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that the individual firms' R&D intensity and acquisitiveness, and industry R&D intensity and gross investment increase the probability of a firm selecting a CEO with a STEM background; whereas being in a technology industry, growth potential, and the firm's own gross investment have no direct impact on the selection of the CEO.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
