Abstract

IntroductionContinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been widely used in critically ill acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. Moreover, some centers operate a specialized CRRT team (SCT) composed of physicians and nurses, but few studies have yet determined the superiority of SCT control.MethodsA total of 334 among 534 patients in the original cohort, who started CRRT for severe AKI between August 2007 and September 2009 in Yonsei University Health System and were matched with a propensity score (PS), were divided into two groups based on SCT application. Moreover, we compared CRRT-related outcomes including down-time per day and lost time per filter-exchange between the two groups. The primary outcomes were 28- and 90-day all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the rates of renal function recovery at 28- and 90-day.ResultsThe down-time per day, lost time per filter-exchange, and red blood cell-transfused numbers during CRRT treatment were significantly lower after SCT approach compared with the group before SCT, while net ultrafiltration rate in the after SCT group was significantly higher compared to the before SCT group. During the study period, the 28- and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were significantly decreased after SCT application. Cox regression analysis revealed that 28- and 90-day all-cause mortality rates were significantly lower under SCT control, after adjusting for primary diagnosis, emergent surgical cases, Charlson Comorbidity Index and biochemical parameters. However, there were no significant differences in the rate of renal function recovery before and after SCT approach in CRRT.ConclusionsA well-organized CRRT team could be beneficial for clinical outcomes through improving quality of care in AKI patients requiring CRRT treatment in the ICU.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-014-0454-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been widely used in critically ill acute kidney injury (AKI) patients

  • The proportion of male patients was significantly higher in the after-specialized CRRT team (SCT) group compared with the before-SCT group (68.2% versus 58.7%, P = 0.028), while acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score were significantly lower in the after-SCT group compared to the before-SCT group (APACHE II score; 26.9 versus 28.4, P = 0.029 and SOFA score; 11.9 versus 14.2, P = 0.031)

  • Total CRRT time was significantly lower under SCT in both cohorts, whereas the median filter lifespan during the CRRT treatment was significantly higher after the SCT approach compared with the group before SCT only in original cohort (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been widely used in critically ill acute kidney injury (AKI) patients. Some centers operate a specialized CRRT team (SCT) composed of physicians and nurses, but few studies have yet determined the superiority of SCT control. Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) is a well-recognized complication in critically ill patients and has a substantial impact on morbidity, mortality, and health resource utilization in this population [1,2,3,4,5]. Some centers operate specialized CRRT teams (SCT) with physicians and nurses from their disciplines [12]. We used propensity score (PS) matching to investigate the benefit of SCT management for 28- and 90-day all-cause mortalities and renal function recovery in AKI patients undergoing CRRT

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call