Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe antibiotic minocycline has neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory properties that could prevent or reverse progressive neuropathic changes implicated in recent-onset schizophrenia. In the BeneMin study, we aimed to replicate the benefit of minocycline on negative symptoms reported in previous pilot studies, and to understand the mechanisms involved.MethodsIn this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited people with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder that had begun within the past 5 years with continuing positive symptoms from 12 National Health Service (NHS) trusts. Participants were randomly assigned according to an automated permuted blocks algorithm, stratified by pharmacy, to receive minocycline (200 mg per day for 2 weeks, then 300 mg per day for the remainder of the 12-month study period) or matching placebo, which were added to their continuing treatment. The primary clinical outcome was the negative symptom subscale score of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scales (PANSS) across follow-ups at months 2, 6, 9, and 12. The primary biomarker outcomes were medial prefrontal grey-matter volume, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation during a working memory task, and plasma concentration of interleukin 6. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN49141214, and the EU Clinical Trials register (EudraCT) number is 2010-022463-35I.FindingsBetween April 16, 2013, and April 30, 2015, we recruited 207 people and randomly assigned them to receive minocycline (n=104) or placebo (n=103). Compared with placebo, the addition of minocycline had no effect on ratings of negative symptoms (treatment effect difference −0·19, 95% CI −1·23 to 0·85; p=0·73). The primary biomarker outcomes did not change over time and were not affected by minocycline. The groups did not differ in the rate of serious adverse events (n=11 in placebo group and n=18 in the minocycline group), which were mostly due to admissions for worsening psychiatric state (n=10 in the placebo group and n=15 in the minocycline group). The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (n=12 in the placebo group, n=19 in the minocycline group), psychiatric (n=16 in placebo group, n=8 in minocycline group), nervous system (n=8 in the placebo group, n=12 in the minocycline group), and dermatological (n=10 in the placebo group, n=8 in the minocycline group).InterpretationMinocycline does not benefit negative or other symptoms of schizophrenia over and above adherence to routine clinical care in first-episode psychosis. There was no evidence of a persistent progressive neuropathic or inflammatory process underpinning negative symptoms. Further trials of minocycline in early psychosis are not warranted until there is clear evidence of an inflammatory process, such as microgliosis, against which minocycline has known efficacy.FundingNational Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme, an MRC and NIHR partnership.

Highlights

  • Antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia can effectively promote remission of so-called positive psychotic symptoms, such as delusions, hallucinations, and disorganised speech

  • Convergent PET imaging studies show little evidence that microglial inflammation occurs in drug-free patients with schizophrenia; together with the absence of effect of minocycline, the results suggest that active neuroinflammation involving microglial activation and neuropathology is not a pervasive feature of the first years of schizophrenia

  • In the BeneMin study, we aimed to replicate the therapeutic effects of minocycline in a large sample, to characterise the time course over 12 months, and to test the hypothesis that any benefit of minocycline on negative symptoms is due to neuro-protection, possibly involving anti-inflammatory actions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia can effectively promote remission of so-called positive psychotic symptoms, such as delusions, hallucinations, and disorganised speech. Neuroscience and Psychiatry Unit (Prof B Deakin FMedSci, K Byrne BA, E Knox PhD, R Smallman PhD), MAHSC (Prof B Deakin, S Lewis MD), Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology (I B Chaudhry MD), Division of Psychology and Mental Health (R J Drake PhD, N Husain MRCPsych), and Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care (G Dunn PhD), The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Prestwich, Manchester, UK (Prof B Deakin, R J Drake, S Lewis); Brain Mapping Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Herchel Smith Building for Brain and Mind Sciences (J Suckling PhD, P B Jones MD) and Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical Neurosciences (D M Lisiecka-Ford PhD), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK (J Suckling, P B Jones); Centre for Psychiatry, Imperial College London, London, UK (T R E Barnes DSc); Tropical Clinical Trials Unit, Liverpool www.thelancet.com/psychiatry Vol 5 November 2018.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call