The benefit of a double ventricular extra stimuli protocol to improve functional substrate mapping during ablation of ventricular tachycardia. - The S3-VT-FREE project

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) based on substrate-based mapping has been proposed to itemize areas of interest identifying areas of low-voltage, late potentials (LPs), and deceleration zones (DZs). However, partial delineation of targets for ablation is likely responsible for a suboptimal long-term success rate. The abnormal electrograms (EGMs), featuring low-voltage near-field components may be hidden within the high-amplitude far-field signal. We hypothesized that the acquisition of functional mapping after double ventricular extrastimuli (S3 protocol) would uncover relevant areas of functional substrate that could be missed during sinus or S1 map. We aim to evaluate the potential benefit and the feasibility of functional substrate mapping using an S3 protocol for VT ablation and to assess its colocalization with detected corridors using late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-MRI). Methods We included consecutively 29 patients with structural cardiomypathy who underwent a VT ablation. The S3 protocol included: (1) assessment of the ventricular effective refractory period (ERP), (2) pacing protocol from the apex of the right ventricle with S1 x 6 (cycle length: 600ms) followed by S2 (ERP+30ms) and S3 (ERP+50ms). Electroanatomical mapping was acquired with the EnsiteX system (Abbott, IL) using HD Grid catheter and omnipolar signals. ILAMs were used to identify deceleration zones and areas of late potentials were identified for all maps. A non-invasive substrate assessment was done with LGE-MRI and post-processing with a commercially available system (ADAS3D, Spain) with automated identification of corridors. Results The S3 protocol was completed in 25 of the 29 procedures (86.2%). The repeated induction of ventricular arrhythmias did not allow for full protocol of the S3 protocol in 4 patients (13.8%). The functional substrate identified during the S3 activation mapping was significantly more extensive than the one identified using S1 and S2 activation mappings (p<0.05) (Table). The S3 protocol unmasked a higher number of DZs (p<0.01), a wider area of LPs (p<0.01), and a longer duration of the DZs (p=0.01). All DZ maps were compared with preprocedural cardiac magnetic resonance. The number of DZs matching with conduction corridors identified by LGE-MRI was higher in the activation mapping of S3 compared with the S1 and S2 ones (p=0.02). After VT ablation based on an S3 protocol, 88% of patients have been VT free during a median follow-up of 9 months. Conclusions This novel substrate-based protocol to assess the ventricular functional substrate is feasible in the majority of patients (86.2%) and allows for a better identification of targets for ablation and could facilitate VT ablation, and improve the prognosis of the patients after ablation.