Abstract

If discourse analysis fails to account for the infinite realities of the divine Logos, this would not prevent us from trying to discover, within the limits of the analogy, that syntactic operations could correspond to such characteristics of the enunciation of the divine Logos and its self-communication, in the perspectives of Karl Rahner and Joseph Moingt. After all, it will be in the operations of a kind of theological syntax that we will be able to search for such grammar, because these operations undoubtedly assume that theology points to a discourse and,consequently, to the existence of a theological language. A grammar of relations evokes and therefore announces The Being in becoming, revealing a God who speaks and who would not speak through the opacity of Creation if he did not speak, before, in Himself, not to Himself, but to others, in Himself: a true dialogical Logos.

Highlights

  • Introduction historiquement concrète de Jésus deNazareth mériteLe rapport entre Dieu et le monde créé n’est pas simplement un rapport de création

  • Son dynamisme nous entraîne dans un dresser la carte de ces relations et articuler pour l’être mouvement éternel de désir qui répond à l’image d’une humain le terrain où il fonde sa relation avec Dieu pour source, comme celle évoquée par Balthasar : bien que féconder en même temps sa relation avec le monde l’image soit bonne, elle ne suffira jamais

  • Essai sur la philosophie religieuse de Grégoire de Nysse

Read more

Summary

By Andre Luis De Araujo

Universidade Catolica de Pernambuco Abstract- If discourse analysis fails to account for the infinite realities of the divine Logos, this would not prevent us from trying to discover, within the limits of the analogy, that syntactic operations could correspond to such characteristics of the enunciation of the divine Logos and its self-communication, in the perspectives of Karl Rahner and Joseph Moingt. A grammar of relations evokes and announces The Being in becoming, revealing a God who speaks and who would not speak through the opacity of Creation if he did not speak, before, in Himself, not to Himself, but to others, in Himself: a true dialogical Logos. L’Être En Devenir Ou Le Devenir-Homme Du Fils De Dieu : Rahner Et L’énonciation Du Logos En Devenir

Andre Luis De Araujo
Moingt adopte bien ce registre du langage biblique en
Conclusion
Références Bibliographiques
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call