Abstract

AbstractHuman-AGI relations are soon going to be a subject to number of policies and regulations. Although most current Blue Sky de lege ferenda postulates towards robot and artificial intelligence regulatory framework are focused on the liability of the producer or the owner of the AI based product, one might try to conceptualize the legal relations and rules for the coexistence between humans and an anthropocognitive AI’s (AGI) possessing proper capacity. The main purpose of this article is to explore the possibility of applying the principles of Metalaw to mentioned relations. The scope shall consider a non-chattel and non-property based status of those types of AIs, as well as sufficient advancement of such entities, or the emergence of advanced non-human based intelligence.

Highlights

  • Introduction other space law scholarsThe concept was conceived in th times prior to the launch of Sputnik on the 4 of October 1957 and any Martian or Venusian flyby mission, Laws are made by humans

  • Most current Blue Sky de lege ferenda postulates towards robot and artificial intelligence regulatory framework are focused on the liability of the producer or the owner of the AI based product, one might try to conceptualize the legal relations and rules for the coexistence between humans and an anthropocognitive AI’s (AGI) possessing proper capacity

  • Metalaw was created to establish a form of a common set of rules that would be applicable in outer space, especially in relations with Extraterrestrial intelligences

Read more

Summary

AGI and strong AI

The creation of a human level general intelligence is one of the early promises and fears of modern day popular and intellectual culture. Hallevy has some quired for a system in order to achieve human or animal valid points regarding the problem of criminal liability of like self-awareness This would require the possession an autonomous AI and making autonomous AIs obey the of a properly complex sensory apparatus or virtual input law. It can be potential liability [27] In this case, an AGI equipped with seen especially in the use of human-like intelligence, in a human-level general and behavioral intelligence should comparison with goal oriented AIs and trained systems. An AGI equipped with seen especially in the use of human-like intelligence, in a human-level general and behavioral intelligence should comparison with goal oriented AIs and trained systems. According to the aforementioned princibefore they can be recognized as surpassing that level. ple, humans require legal protection against any damage that might be a result from actions of an AGI/Strong AI

Current approach
Metalaw
Every race has the right to defend itself against any
The applicability of Metalaw
Any act which causes damage to another race must be avoided
Every partner of Metalaw has the right of self-determination
In case of damage the injurer must restore the integrity of the injured party
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.