Abstract
Abstract If doxa’s defining object is what seems, then the Basic Conception of doxa will be cognition of what seems. This chapter argues that this conception can do the work of explaining the various features Plato attributes to doxa, with a focus on the most controversial: the restriction of doxa to the perceptible realm of Becoming. I argue that on Plato’s view Becoming seems, and so we have doxa of it, while Being does not seem, and so we have no doxa of it. I address the philosophical objections to this claim by showing that Plato can nonetheless account for thoughts about Forms which fall short of epistêmê, by appealing to a third, “in between” category in his epistemology: dianoia (“thought”). I then address the apparent textual evidence for Forms seeming, and for doxa of Forms, arguing that it can be accommodated.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.