Abstract

This paper compares and contrasts the ecosystems of the Barents and Chukchi Seas. Despite their similarity in a number of features, the Barents Sea supports a vast biomass of commercially important fish, but the Chukchi does not. Here we examine a number of aspects of these two seas to ascertain how they are similar and how they differ. We then indentify processes and mechanisms that may be responsible for their similarities and differences.Both the Barents and Chukchi Seas are high latitude, seasonally ice covered, Arctic shelf-seas. Both have strongly advective regimes, and receive water from the south. Water entering the Barents comes from the deep, ice-free and “warm” Norwegian Sea, and contains not only heat, but also a rich supply of zooplankton that supports larval fish in spring. In contrast, Bering Sea water entering the Chukchi in spring and early summer is cold. In spring, this Bering Sea water is depleted of large, lipid-rich zooplankton, thus likely resulting in a relatively low availability of zooplankton for fish. Although primary production on average is similar in the two seas, fish biomass density is an order of magnitude greater in the Barents than in the Chukchi Sea. The Barents Sea supports immense fisheries, whereas the Chukchi Sea does not. The density of cetaceans in the Barents Sea is about double that in the Chukchi Sea, as is the density of nesting seabirds, whereas, the density of pinnipeds in the Chukchi is about double that in the Barents Sea. In the Chukchi Sea, export of carbon to the benthos and benthic biomass may be greater. We hypothesize that the difference in fish abundance in the two seas is driven by differences in the heat and plankton advected into them, and the amount of primary production consumed in the upper water column. However, we suggest that the critical difference between the Chukchi and Barents Seas is the pre-cooled water entering the Chukchi Sea from the south. This cold water, and the winter mixing of the Chukchi Sea as it becomes ice covered, result in water temperatures below the physiological limits of the commercially valuable fish that thrive in the southeastern Bering Sea. If climate change warms the Barents Sea, thereby increasing the open water area via reducing ice cover, productivity at most trophic levels is likely to increase. In the Chukchi, warming should also reduce sea ice cover, permitting a longer production season. However, the shallow northern Bering and Chukchi Seas are expected to continue to be ice-covered in winter, so water there will continue to be cold in winter and spring, and is likely to continue to be a barrier to the movement of temperate fish into the Chukchi Sea. Thus, it is unlikely that large populations of boreal fish species will become established in this Arctic marginal sea.

Highlights

  • Comparative studies of marine ecosystems provide the opportunity to identify ecosystem components or processes that play a critical role in determining ecosystem productivity (Drinkwater et al, 2009; Hunt and Megrey, 2005; Megrey and Aydin, 2009)

  • Given the available data, it appears that the Barents Sea has, on average, a lower macrobenthic biomass (166.5 g m−2 wet mass±41.9 g m−2 SE, N=105) than the Chukchi Sea (380.5 g m−2± 40.8 g m−2, wet biomass, N=163), though, because of the nonrandom sampling in both seas and highly skewed depth distributions of the data we had available, the uncertainty around these estimates may be greater than suggested by the SE alone

  • Overall, when we examine the fishery production and the standing stocks of fish, cetaceans and nesting seabirds in the Barents and Chukchi Seas, it is difficult to see how the higher fish stocks and fisheries yields of the Barents Sea can be accounted for on the basis of autochthonous primary productivity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Comparative studies of marine ecosystems provide the opportunity to identify ecosystem components or processes that play a critical role in determining ecosystem productivity (Drinkwater et al, 2009; Hunt and Megrey, 2005; Megrey and Aydin, 2009). The Barents and Chukchi Seas have their southern extremes at 70°N and 66°N, respectively, while their northern borders extend to the edge of the continental shelf of the Arctic Ocean (Fig. 1) Despite this geographic similarity, the two seas differ remarkably in the productivity of their fisheries, even when expressed on a per unit area basis. The two seas differ remarkably in the productivity of their fisheries, even when expressed on a per unit area basis It is not known whether these differences in fisheries are the result of differences in: 1) the standing stocks of fish populations; 2) local rates of primary and secondary production; 3) the pathways of energy and material through the ecosystems; or 4) the heat, nutrient and plankton content of waters advected into these seas.

Geography of the Barents and Chukchi Seas
Physical oceanography
Fishery catches
Comparisons of standing stocks and productivity
Standing stocks of fish
Standing stocks of seabirds
Standing stocks of marine mammals
Standing stocks of marine benthos
Standing stocks of zooplankton
Summary of standing stocks and productivity
Water depth and export of carbon to the benthos
Migratory behavior of top predators
Water inputs and their sources
Climate warming
Effects of climate change on seabirds and marine mammals
Findings
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call