Abstract

Although the top tier journals consistently score well on various bibliometric methods, lesser known and newly emergent journals often show greater variance. A key issues resides in the assumptions made in assessing the journals. We provide an analysis of entrepreneurship journal quality based on an emerging method: the Author Affiliation Index (AAI). The AAI assumes that top authors target their work in top tier journals, and hence the quality of a journal can be inferred by the amount of articles which are published by top tier authors. A review of AAI indices across numerous domains exhibit great variance in the boundary conditions they employ. We examine 25 journals through multiple AAI measures (for years 2007-2011), and discern that how international schools and non-academic authors are handled can greatly vary the AAI scores. We find that Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, Journal of Business Venturing, and Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice all consistently score well, and that journals such as Family Business Review and Journal of Small business Management score well under certain conditions, but less so under others.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call