Abstract
In Britain there was a reduction in hospitalisations for removal of impacted teeth (in particular third molars) following the introduction of evidence-based guidelines. However, the guideline approach has not been as successful in other countries, even those with a significant historical connection. In Australia, hospitalisation (ie to undergo treatment under general anaesthesia) for the removal of impacted teeth constitutes about two thirds of all oral health-related conditions requiring treatment under general anaesthesia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
