The auditors’ review report

Abstract

The interim report was introduced by the Stock Exchange in 1964 and, despite its importance, remains lightly regulated. Despite the lack of regulatory pressures there have been significant changes in practice and one has been the appearance of the auditors’ review report. Compares various features of the interim reports of 138 companies for 1992 and 1997. Demonstrates the changes which have taken place over that period and seeks to explain the variables which are most closely associated with the presence of an auditors’ review report. Finds that it is the larger companies which are most likely to publish an auditors’ review report. There is also evidence that the presence of auditor involvement is not associated with delay in the issue of interim reports, but is associated with the voluntary disclosure of additional information. Suggests that the practice of publishing an auditors’ review report is likely to increase and that it is appropriate for the Auditing Practices Board to issue relevant guidance on the subject.