Abstract

This chapter considers the response of the African Union (AU) to two types of unconstitutional change: fraudulent electoral practices and the refusal of incumbent presidents to step down from office following electoral defeat. The chapter addresses the AU’s legal and policy framework for intervention on the occurrence of unconstitutional change of government. In addressing these issues, the chapter considers AU response to election crises in Kenya (2007), Zimbabwe (2008), Cote d’Ivoire (2010), and Gambia (2016). With the exception of Gambia, the AU preference is for power sharing. The chapter concludes that the AU is making positive progress but that in each case the AU’s ultimate support for an incumbent undermines any deterrent and regulatory effect which AU law and policy may have. It also concludes that a revision of the definition of unconstitutional change coupled with firmer responses against perpetrators, including through criminal prosecution, would better advance peace, security, democracy, and development in Africa.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.