The Atomic Debates: "Memorable and Interesting Evenings in the Life of the Chemical Society"

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Atomic Debates: "Memorable and Interesting Evenings in the Life of the Chemical Society"W. H. Brock and D. M. KnightW. H. Brock Search for more articles by this author and D. M. Knight Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 56, Number 1Spring, 1965 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/349922 Views: 20Total views on this site Citations: 17Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1965 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Timothy J. Sluckin Les vertus des défauts: The scientific works of the late Mr Maurice Kleman analysed, discussed and placed in historical context, with particular stress on dislocation, disclination and other manner of local material disbehaviour, Liquid Crystals Reviews (Sep 2022): 1–0.https://doi.org/10.1080/21680396.2022.2115417Peter J. Heaney Heirs of the revolution: X-ray diffraction and the birth of the Mineralogical Society of America, American Mineralogist 105, no.11 (Jan 2020): 3–21.https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2020-7205J. Tenreiro Machado, António M. Lopes A computational perspective of the periodic table of elements, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 78 (Nov 2019): 104883.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.104883Timothy J. Sluckin Some reflections on defects in liquid crystals: from Amerio to Zannoni and beyond, Liquid Crystals 24 (Jul 2018): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1080/02678292.2018.1500652Colin Foster Creationism as a Misconception: Socio-cognitive conflict in the teaching of evolution, International Journal of Science Education 34, no.1414 (May 2012): 2171–2180.https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.692102William H. Brock The Atomic Debates Revisited, (Aug 2010): 59–64.https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2010-1044.ch005Elizabeth Garber Subjects great and small: Maxwell on Saturn's rings and kinetic theory, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 366, no.18711871 (Jan 2008): 1697–1705.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2179Brian T. Sutcliffe The development of the idea of a chemical bond, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry 58, no.66 (Jan 1996): 645–655.https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-461X(1996)58:6<645::AID-QUA7>3.0.CO;2-YAbraham Pais Introducing atoms and their nuclei, (Feb 2010): 43–141.https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420050776.ch2Abraham Pais Die Realität der Moleküle, (Jan 1986): 75–104.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-98740-2_5Umberto Bottazzini Dall' analisi matematica al calcolo geometrico: origini delle prime ricerche di logica di peano, History and Philosophy of Logic 6, no.11 (Aug 2007): 25–52.https://doi.org/10.1080/01445348508837075M. Christine King The Course of Chemical Change: the Life and Times of Augustus G. Vernon Harcourt (1834–1919), Ambix 31, no.11 (Jul 2013): 16–31.https://doi.org/10.1179/amb.1984.31.1.16Mario Morselli The Molecular Hypothesis: From 1811 to Cannizzaro’s ‘sunto’ in 1858, (Jan 1984): 131–193.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6265-1_4E. Robert Paul Alexander W. Williamson on the atomic theory: A study of nineteenth-century British atomism, Annals of Science 35, no.11 (Aug 2006): 17–31.https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797800200111H R Post Atomism 1900 II, Physics Education 3, no.66 (Aug 2002): 307–312.https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/3/6/305Robert E. Schofield Joseph Priestley, Natural Philosopher, Ambix 14, no.11 (Nov 2013): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1179/amb.1967.14.1.1FRANK GREENAWAY John Dalton as a Historical Figure, Nature 211, no.50535053 (Sep 1966): 1013–1014.https://doi.org/10.1038/2111013a0