Abstract
This paper tests the asymmetry in government spending multipliers using the panel data in the US postwar states. Empirical results show that output and employment rate respond asymmetrically to military procurement spending shocks with different signs and magnitudes. Our findings suggest that expansionary multipliers are much larger than contractionary multipliers, and that small-scale spending shocks tend to have a greater impact than large-scale ones.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
