Abstract
The hippocampus is thought to be an associative memory “convergence zone,” binding together the multimodal elements of an experienced event into a single engram. This predicts a degree of dependency between the retrieval of the different elements comprising an event. We present data from a series of studies designed to address this prediction. Participants vividly imagined a series of person–location–object events, and memory for these events was assessed across multiple trials of cued retrieval. Consistent with the prediction, a significant level of dependency was found between the retrieval of different elements from the same event. Furthermore, the level of dependency was sensitive both to retrieval task, with higher dependency during cued recall than cued recognition, and to subjective confidence. We propose a simple model, in which events are stored as multiple pairwise associations between individual event elements, and dependency is captured by a common factor that varies across events. This factor may relate to between-events modulation of the strength of encoding, or to a process of within-event “pattern completion” at retrieval. The model predicts the quantitative pattern of dependency in the data when changes in the level of guessing with retrieval task and confidence are taken into account. Thus, we find direct behavioral support for the idea that memory for complex multimodal events depends on the pairwise associations of their constituent elements and that retrieval of the various elements corresponding to the same event reflects a common factor that varies from event to event.
Highlights
MethodThe two subsequent blocks cued each event using the remaining noncued items (e.g., if cued by location in the first block, the second block may have been cued by person and the third by object)
In order to account for this dependency, we developed a dependent model, where withinevent performance was modulated by an episodic factor (Ei) that varies across events
We have provided evidence that the retrieval of events is modulated by a within-event episodic factor that varies across events
Summary
The two subsequent blocks cued each event using the remaining noncued items (e.g., if cued by location in the first block, the second block may have been cued by person and the third by object) Within this structure, four pseudo-randomized test sequences were created and rotated across participants. Contingency tables for the observed data and the independent model were created for each individual participant for each cue type to assess the dependency between the retrieval of two items (e.g., person and object) using the same cue type (e.g., location) within a single cued-recall trial (the ABAC analysis). The independent model is explicitly designed to assess dependency without the confounding presence of accuracy (see Brady, Konkle, Alvarez, & Oliva, 2012, for discussion of this issue)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.