The associations of socioeconomic status with structural brain damage and connectivity and cognition: The Maastricht Study

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSocioeconomic inequalities in the risk for cognitive impairment have been reported, which might partly act through structural brain damage or differential numbers of brain connections (structural connectivity). This study investigated the extent to which the association of early‐life socioeconomic status (SES) with later‐life cognitive performance is mediated by later‐life SES, and whether the association of SES with later‐life cognitive performance can be explained by structural brain damage and connectivity.MethodWe used cross‐sectional data from the population‐based Maastricht study (n = 4,839; mean age 59.2±8.7 years, 49.8% women). Early‐life SES was assessed retrospectively by self‐reported poverty and parental education. Later‐life SES included education, occupation, and household income. Participants underwent cognitive testing and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging to measure volumes of white matter hyperintensities, gray matter, white matter, cerebrospinal fluid, and structural connectivity. Multiple linear regression analyses tested the associations between SES, brain markers and cognition. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and type 2 diabetes (because of oversampling). Structural equation modeling tested mediation.ResultHigher SES was associated with higher grey matter volume, lower white matter volume, and higher structural connectivity. Structural brain damage and lower structural connectivity were associated with lower overall cognitive performance. Both higher early‐life and later‐life SES were associated with overall higher cognitive performance (B [95% CI] medium versus low early‐life SES = 0.17[0.12;0.23]; B high versus low early‐life SES = 0.26[0.20;0.32]; B medium versus low later‐life SES = 0.46[0.41;0.52]; B high versus low later‐life SES = 0.72[0.67;0.78]). The association of early‐life SES with later‐life cognitive performance was partly mediated by later‐life SES (73.8%). The extent to which the association of SES with cognitive performance could be explained by structural brain damage or connectivity was marginal (up to 5.9%).ConclusionThough there was an association between early‐life SES and later‐life cognitive performance independent of later‐life SES, a large part of this association could be explained by later‐life SES. Structural brain damage and connectivity marginally explained socioeconomic inequalities in cognitive performance. More research is needed to investigate alternative pathways that explain associations of life‐course SES with later‐life cognition.