Abstract

In this paper, we define the Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP) for those working with human role players who interact with learners in a wide range of experiential learning and assessment contexts. These human role players are variously described by such terms as standardized/simulated patients or simulated participants (SP or SPs). ASPE is a global organization whose mission is to share advances in SP-based pedagogy, assessment, research, and scholarship as well as support the professional development of its members. The SOBP are intended to be used in conjunction with the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL) Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM, which address broader simulation practices. We begin by providing a rationale for the creation of the ASPE SOBP, noting that with the increasing use of simulation in healthcare training, it is incumbent on ASPE to establish SOBP that ensure the growth, integrity, and safe application of SP-based educational endeavors. We then describe the three and a half year process through which these standards were developed by a consensus of international experts in the field. Key terms used throughout the document are defined. Five underlying values inform the SOBP: safety, quality, professionalism, accountability, and collaboration. Finally, we describe five domains of best practice: safe work environment; case development; SP training for role portrayal, feedback, and completion of assessment instruments; program management; and professional development. Each domain is divided into principles with accompanying key practices that provide clear and practical guidelines for achieving desired outcomes and creating simulations that are safe for all stakeholders. Failure to follow the ASPE SOBP could compromise the safety of participants and the effectiveness of a simulation session. Care has been taken to make these guidelines precise yet flexible enough to address the diversity of varying contexts of SP practice. As a living document, these SOBP will be reviewed and modified periodically under the direction of the ASPE Standards of Practice Committee as SP methodology grows and adapts to evolving simulation practices.

Highlights

  • Human simulation is a recognized methodology that involves human role players interacting with learners in a wide range of experiential learning and assessment contexts

  • The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) is the global organization focused on human simulation [3]

  • The Standards of Best Practice (SOBP) are organized into five domains: safe work environment; case development; simulated patient (SP) training for role portrayal, feedback, and completion of assessment instruments; program management; and professional development

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Human simulation is a recognized methodology that involves human role players interacting with learners in a wide range of experiential learning and assessment contexts. Round three involved a final separate consensus for unification of this document by a team of reviewers (June, 2016) drawn from the ASPE Board of Directors (Table 3) These experts made final revisions (including changing the draft’s title from SOP to SOBP) and prepared this manuscript. SPs can provide feedback on learner performance from the perspective of the person they portray, which is unique to working with SPs. As noted in the rationale, SP-based education has grown in size and scope of practice to include many different roles. As noted in the rationale, SP-based education has grown in size and scope of practice to include many different roles For this reason, the term simulated participant is being used as a more inclusive term to refer to all human role players in any. Some may be trainers who exclusively work with SPs, while some may be faculty or healthcare professionals who work with SPs as part of their clinical and/or academic roles

Discussion
Preparation
Case components
Training for feedback
Reflection on the training process
Expertise
Records management
Team management
Quality management
Career development
Leadership
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call