Abstract
BackgroundInterleukin-6 (IL-6) is an important proinflammatory cytokine, and some studies have demonstrated that IL-6 promoter polymorphisms (−174G/C and −572G/C) may be associated with intracranial aneurysms. A meta-analysis based on the evidence currently available from the literature was conducted to make a more precise estimation of this relationship. MethodsElectronic databases (the National Library of Medline and Embase databases) were searched before June 2013. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated in fixed- or random-effects models when appropriate. Subgroup analyses were performed by race. This meta-analysis included six case-control studies, which included 1188 intracranial aneurysms cases and 4099 controls. ResultsThe combined results based on all studies showed that intracranial aneurysms cases had a significantly lower frequency of −572CC [OR (Recessive model)=0.47, 95% CI=0.36, 0.60, P<0.001; OR (Codominant model)=0.29, 95% CI=0.20, 0.44, P<0.001], −572GC [OR (Codominant model)=0.73, 95% CI=0.55, 0.98, P=0.04] and −174CC [OR (Recessive model)=0.73, 95% CI=0.54, 0.98, P=0.03; OR (Codominant model)=0.70, 95% CI=0.51, 0.97, P=0.03] genotype. In the subgroup analysis by race, we found that (1) intracranial aneurysms cases had a significantly lower frequency of −572CC [OR (Recessive model)=0.41, 95% CI=0.32, 0.53, P<0.001; OR (Codominant model)=0.18, 95% CI=0.12, 0.29, P<0.001] and −572GC [OR (Codominant model)=0.61, 95% CI=0.42, 0.88, P=0.009] genotype in Asians; (2) intracranial aneurysms cases had a significantly higher frequency of −572CC [OR (Recessive model)=4.41, 95% CI=1.35, 14.36, P=0.01; OR (Codominant model)=4.41, 95% CI=1.35, 14.38, P=0.01] genotype and lower frequency of −174CC [OR (Recessive model)=0.73, 95% CI=0.54, 0.98, P=0.03; OR (Codominant model)=0.70, 95% CI=0.51, 0.97, P=0.03] genotype in Caucasians. ConclusionsOur meta-analysis suggested that IL-6 promoter polymorphisms (−174G/C and −572G/C) were associated with intracranial aneurysms. However, due to the small subjects included in analysis and the selection bias in some studies, the results should be interpreted with caution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.