Abstract

To investigate the association between care co-ordination and use of the Emergency Department (ED) in older managed care enrollees. Nested case-control with 103 cases (used the ED) and 194 controls (did not use the ED). Older patients with multiple chronic illnesses enrolled in a care management programme of a large group-model health maintenance organisation with more than 50,000 members over the age of 64. Better care co-ordination was defined as timely follow-up after a change in treatment; fewer decision-makers involved with the care plan; and a higher patient-perceived rating of overall care co-ordination. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between ED use (the outcome variable) and measures of care co-ordination (the predictor variables). Self-reported care co-ordination was not significantly different between cases and controls for any of the four classifications of inappropriate ED use. Similarly, no differences were found in the number of different physicians or medication prescribers involved in the patients' care. Four-week follow-up after potentially high-risk events for subsequent ED use, including changes in chronic disease medications, missed encounters, and same day encounters, did not differ between subjects with inappropriate ED use and controls. Existing measures of care co-ordination were not associated with inappropriate ED use in this study of older adults with complex care needs. The absence of an association may, in part, be attributable to the paucity of validated measures to assess care co-ordination, as well as the methodological complexity inherent in studying this topic. Future research should focus on the development of new measures and on approaches that better isolate the role of care co-ordination from other potential variables that influence utilisation.

Highlights

  • Older adults with chronic illness often have complex care needs

  • Better care co-ordination was defined as timely follow-up after a change in treatment; fewer decision-makers involved with the care plan; and a higher patient-perceived rating of overall care co-ordination

  • Existing measures of care co-ordination were not associated with inappropriate Emergency Department (ED) use in this study of older adults with complex care needs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Older adults with chronic illness often have complex care needs. For many of these individuals, care coordination is needed to ensure that different components of the health delivery system (e.g. different professionals and different institutions) do not function independently of one another, or worse, at cross purposes. The two terms refer to different health care constructs w8x. Care co-ordination refers to the primary practitioner’s ability to integrate care from multiple practitioners as well as provide follow-up through subsequent visits. Care continuity refers to continuous care by a practitioner over time. These constructs have been assessed from the perspective of the patient. For the purpose of this article, better care co-ordination was defined as timely follow-up after a change in treatment, fewer decisionmakers involved with the care plan, and a higher patient-perceived rating of overall care co-ordination

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call