Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXTA screw-rod system is the most widely used technique for atlantoaxial instability (AAI). However, neglecting anomalies of the vertebral artery and axis could lead to fatal complications. Whether or not the presence of AAI is associated with a more complicated anatomy for instrumentation is unclear. PURPOSETo analyze the association between AAI and anomalies of the vertebral artery and axis in patients with and without AAI. STUDY DESIGNA retrospective comparative study. PATIENT SAMPLEOne hundred and twenty patients who underwent preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography with vertebral angiography of the cervical spine at our institution from 2012 to 2020. OUTCOME MEASURESThe C2 isthmus height, internal height of the C2 lateral mass, and C2 pedicle width were radiologically assessed. METHODSA case control study with matched cohort analysis was conducted. One hundred and twenty patients were divided into 2 groups according to presence of AAI, and the presence of high-riding vertebral artery (HRVA) and a narrow pedicle for insertion of the C2 pedicle screw was assessed, as was the prevalence of extraosseous vertebral artery anomaly. RESULTSThe C2 isthmus height, C2 internal height, and C2 pedicle width were significantly narrower in the AAI group (p<.01, <.01, and <.01, respectively). A significantly greater proportion of patients with AAI had HRVA and a narrow pedicle than those without (p<.01 and < 0.01, respectively). Among patients with AAI, the C2 internal height was significantly narrower in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p<.01). Five patients (8.3%) with AAI had vertebral artery anomaly (3 fenestration, 2 persistent first intersegmental artery), while there were no vertebral artery anomalies in patients without AAI (p<.01). CONCLUSIONSVertebral artery anomalies are more common in patients with AAI. Furthermore, posterior instrumentation in patients with AAI has a narrower safe zone compared to that in patients without AAI, which may be caused by a long-lasting deformity rather than a congenital deformity. Therefore, more thorough preoperative evaluation of the anatomy should be performed in these patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call