Abstract
The Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music: A Social and Cultural History. By David C. H. Wright. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell Press, 2013. [xi, 274 p. ISBN 9781843837343. [pounds sterling]50.] Illustrations, tables, appendices, bibliography, index. David Wright's book on the social and cultural history of the Associated Board of the Royal Schools of Music (ABRSM) is the first serious independent study be published and will coincide with the Board's 125th anniversary in 2014. It marks a natural development in Wright's publication record, which, in addition this, his first book, comprises a number of articles, book chapters and reviews on the social and cultural history of London's music scene from the late-nineteenth the early twenty-first century. Wright has an engaging prose style: it is colorful, witty and adroit; earlier publications illustrate a mastery that enables him make the most mundane facts palatable. An apologist for the methodology of the economic and social historian, Cyril Ehrlich (1925-2004), Wright is a revisionist whose opposition what he describes as musicology's long-favored ['life and works'] approach writing about composers and music history is well-documented. His chief criticism is that the life and works format requires from its author a degree of anaesthetic sympathy for the creative subject's output (David C. H. Wright, Situating Stainer, The Musical Times 149, no. 1903 [Summer 2008]: 99-100). He claims that the shift in discussing music in its social context has led a more authentic result in the way musicologists write about music and its history. While it may be desirable eradicate sentimentalism (and inaccuracy) from musicological methodologies, it does not follow that modern musicologists in variably conform Wright's analysis. The publication of social and cultural music histories where musical analysis is relegated a footnote or, worse still, where it is. eradicated altogether because the social historian is ill-equipped form a view, is more desirable. The musicologist and Handel scholar Winton Dean seems settle the point: is a case for a sociological study of music, but it must be written by a musician and not a sociologist ... the unimaginative application of scientific or quasi-scientific method an enquiry touching even the fringes of a living art invariably produces a tedious or ludicrous result--an admonishment that Ehrlich states no social scientist can afford ignore. (Cyril Ehrlich, Economic History and Music, Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association 103 [1976-1977]: 188). The concept of writing a history of all examination board, however we might seem be an act of folly, for institutions such as these are rarely the objects of the kind of loyalty or affection enjoyed by an alma mater. From a practical point of view, there would seem be a very limited market for such studies, which if published, have a tendency gather dust on library shelves; however, the Associated Board, as a subject, has the potential be something of an exception: Better known by its acronym as the ABRSM, [it] has influenced the musical lives and tastes of millions of people since it conducted its first exams in 1890 (p. ix). Founded by the Royal College of Music (RCM) and the Royal Academy of Music (RAM) in 1889, the ABRSM has since become a household name in the United Kingdom and in ninety countries across the world, as the gold standard in graded practical and theoretical music exams. Wright's history is an overview of the Board's work between 1889 and 2009, set out in twelve chapters. A period of some 120 years is covered in 255 pages; consequently, little room is left tease out the more stubborn nuggets of concerning the establishment of the Board while an imperative to respect confidentiality with respect any 'live' commercial, strategic or institutional information undermines the perspective of the last three chapters (p. …
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.