Abstract
A number of researchers have published or presented papers on workplace protection factor (WPF) studies involving half-mask respirators. Individually, each study contains a relatively small amount of data, generally less than 25 data points for any single respirator. Because of the small amount of data, any attempt to quantify the result statistically does not provide useful information on the low end of the distribution of WPFs. Several studies on half-mask respirators were combined to yield a data set with 390 observations. Of these WPF data, 1.5% were less than 10, the best estimate of the 5th percentile was 13, with a 95% confidence interval of 10 to 18. Differences between the mean WPF based on the type of filter were found, but no difference was found between the mean performance of elastomeric and disposable respirators equipped with dust/mist and dust/fume/mist filters.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.