Abstract

The OLI (Operational Land Imager) sensor on Landsat-8 has the potential to meet the requirements of remote sensing of water color. However, the optical properties of inland waters are more complex than those of oceanic waters, and inland atmospheric correction presents additional challenges. We examined the performance of atmospheric correction (AC) methods for remote sensing over three highly turbid or hypereutrophic inland waters in China: Lake Hongze, Lake Chaohu, and Lake Taihu. Four water-AC algorithms (SWIR (Short Wave Infrared), EXP (Exponential Extrapolation), DSF (Dark Spectrum Fitting), and MUMM (Management Unit Mathematics Models)) and three land-AC algorithms (FLAASH (Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercubes), 6SV (a version of Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum), and QUAC (Quick Atmospheric Correction)) were assessed using Landsat-8 OLI data and concurrent in situ data. The results showed that the EXP (and DSF) together with 6SV algorithms provided the best estimates of the remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and band ratios in water-AC algorithms and land-AC algorithms, respectively. AC algorithms showed a discriminating accuracy for different water types (turbid waters, in-water algae waters, and floating bloom waters). For turbid waters, EXP gave the best Rrs in visible bands. For the in-water algae and floating bloom waters, however, all water-algorithms failed due to an inappropriate aerosol model and non-zero reflectance at 1609 nm. The results of the study show the improvements that can be achieved considering SWIR bands and using band ratios, and the need for further development of AC algorithms for complex aquatic and atmospheric conditions, typical of inland waters.

Highlights

  • Since the launch of CZCS, atmospheric correction (AC) for water remote sensing has been dominated by the black pixel assumption for NIR bands; i.e., the TOA radiance in NIR bands is dominated by atmospheric radiance from Rayleigh and aerosol scattering

  • The results showed that the EXP together with 6SV algorithms provided the best estimates of the remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and band ratios in water-AC algorithms and land-AC algorithms, respectively

  • It has a unique solution to each image, because the atmospheric parameters are estimated from the characteristics of the atmosphere in image pixels, and atmospheric information is assessed by the dark target method based on the image itself [58]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the launch of CZCS (the Coastal Zone Color Scanner), atmospheric correction (AC) for water remote sensing (water-AC) has been dominated by the black pixel assumption for NIR (near infrared) bands; i.e., the TOA (top of atmosphere) radiance in NIR bands is dominated by atmospheric radiance from Rayleigh and aerosol scattering. These AC algorithms have been applied to atmospheric correction for inland waters, there are no large-scale comparative assessments of AC algorithms for OLI data of highly turbid eutrophic inland waters. This study compares the performance of four water-AC algorithms (SWIR, EXP, DSF, and MUMM) and three land-AC algorithms (FLAASH, 6SV, and QUAC) using in situ data from shipborne measurements in three turbid and shallow inland lakes in eastern China. EXP, DSF, and MUMM) and three land-AC algorithms (FLAASH, 6SV, and QUAC) using in situ data from shipborne measurements in three turbid and shallow inland lakes in eastern China Typitcoaltlhye, ltohceailrpoopptuiclatliopnrsop[2e8r,t2i9e]s. aLraekedoTamihinuaatned Lbaykpe hCyhtaoophluanakretocnh,asraucstpereinzdededbymeaxtteenrs,ivaendalgCaDl OM (colobrleodomdiss[s3o0l]v. eTdypoircgalalny,icthmeiratotpetri)ca[2l 8p]r.oTpheretsiestahrreedeolmakiensatwederbeyspehleyctotepdlabnekctoanu,sseuospf etnhdeierdimaptoterrt,ance and caonmd CpDleOxiMty,(ctooloteresdt tdhiesspoelvrefodromrgaannciec omfaAtteCr)a[l2g8o].riTthhemses tohvreeer lianklaesnwd ewreasteerlesc.ted because of their importance and complexity, to test the performance of AC algorithms over inland waters

Field Measurements
Satellite Data and Data Matching
The Water-Atmospheric Correction Algorithms
The Land-Atmospheric Correction Algorithms
Statistical Indices
Spectrums and Water Conditions of Study Areas
Assessment of the Water-AC Algorithms
Comparison with In Situ Measurements
Intercomparison of AC Algorithms
Performance of EXP and 6SV in SPM Estimation
Does the Aerosol Model Accord with the Real Situation?
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call