Abstract
Guidelines for mental health professionals regarding an assessment of fitness to stand trial procedure that is functional, context‐dependent and pragmatic (Grisso, 1988) are clearly required; no published tool exists in Australia. This article addresses Victorian legal criteria as outlined by the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997 based upon the Presser criteria. It is argued that the procedure should include the lawyer's predictions regarding the complexity of the forthcoming trial and the ability of the defendant to communicate, together with the mental health professional's assessment of the capacity of the defendant to make decisions. Current difficulties in assessing fitness to stand trial will be presented and an assessment procedure to overcome them is proposed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
