Abstract
Objective To analyze the assessment results of the criminal responsibility of the mentally ill offenders.Methods A case control study was employed in the current study.BPRS,Criminal Responsibility SCale were used to investigate the 147 criminal cases evaluated by forensic psychiatrists from January 2005 to January 2006 in the 5th hospital of Nanning city,Guangxi province.Results (1)There was a significant difference between the responsibility group and no-responsibility group in the BPRS total score(45.23±7.88 vs 31.16±9.32),factor 3(17.23±4.49 vs 8.18±5.19),factor 4(4.80±2.04 vs 3.89±1.67),factor 5(8.18±3.21 vs5.36±3.23).(2)By the discriminatory analysis,the 8 variables such as psychiatric history,psychiatric diagnosis.the BPRS factor 3 and 4,the Responsibility Scale factors 3,4,and 5 were selected into the discriminatory equations.Conclusions 1.The study suggested that the psychiatric diagnosis.psychopathology and its severity of the disorders,the criminal motivation,understand of the consequence and the ability of self-protection play an important role in assessing the criminal responsibility of the mentally ill offenders.2.The study confirmed Criminal Responsibility Scale had the excellent credible and effective degree.And it can be widely used in the assessment of criminal responsibility ofthe mentally ill offenders. Key words: Mentally ill offenders; Criminal responsibility scale; Discriminatory analysis
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.