Abstract
BackgroundVarious plant-derived substrates contain L-rhamnose that can be assimilated by many fungi and its liberation is catalyzed by α-L-rhamnosidases. Initial data obtained in our laboratory focussing on two Aspergillus nidulans α-L-rhamnosidase genes (rhaA and rhaE) showed α-L-rhamnosidase production to be tightly controlled at the level of transcription by the carbon source available. Whilst induction is effected by L-rhamnose, unlike many other glycosyl hydrolase genes repression by glucose and other carbon sources occurs in a manner independent of CreA. To date regulatory genes affecting L-rhamnose utilization and the production of enzymes that yield L-rhamnose as a product have not been identified in A. nidulans. The purpose of the present study is to characterize the corresponding α-L-rhamnosidase transactivator.ResultsIn this study we have identified the rhaR gene in A. nidulans and Neurospora crassa (AN5673, NCU9033) encoding a putative Zn(II)2Cys6 DNA-binding protein. Genetic evidence indicates that its product acts in a positive manner to induce transcription of the A. nidulans L-rhamnose regulon. rhaR-deleted mutants showed reduced ability to induce expression of the α-L-rhamnosidase genes rhaA and rhaE and concomitant reduction in α-L-rhamnosidase production. The rhaR deletion phenotype also results in a significant reduction in growth on L-rhamnose that correlates with reduced expression of the L-rhamnonate dehydratase catabolic gene lraC (AN5672). Gel mobility shift assays revealed RhaR to be a DNA binding protein recognizing a partially symmetrical CGG-X11-CCG sequence within the rhaA promoter. Expression of rhaR alone is insufficient for induction since its mRNA accumulates even in the absence of L-rhamnose, therefore the presence of both functional RhaR and L-rhamnose are absolutely required. In N. crassa, deletion of rhaR also impairs growth on L-rhamnose.ConclusionsTo define key elements of the L-rhamnose regulatory circuit, we characterized a DNA-binding Zn(II)2Cys6 transcription factor (RhaR) that regulates L-rhamnose induction of α-L-rhamnosidases and the pathway for its catabolism in A. nidulans, thus extending the list of fungal regulators of genes encoding plant cell wall polysaccharide degrading enzymes. These findings can be expected to provide valuable information for modulating α-L-rhamnosidase production and L-rhamnose utilization in fungi and could eventually have implications in fungal pathogenesis and pectin biotechnology.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12934-014-0161-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Various plant-derived substrates contain L-rhamnose that can be assimilated by many fungi and its liberation is catalyzed by α-L-rhamnosidases
Focussing on two A. nidulans α-L-rhamnosidase genes we have shown that this control occurs at the level of transcription, being induced by Lrhamnose but, unlike many other glycosyl hydrolase genes, being repressed by glucose and other carbon sources in a manner independent of CreA, the only carbon catabolite repressor protein known to date in filamentous fungi
Identification of the A. nidulans putative α-L-rhamnosidase transactivator based on conspicuous genomic associations From earlier in silico analyses we found that genes homologous to PGUG_03589 (encoding a putative Zn(II)2Cys6 regulatory protein within the LRA cluster; [15]) in diverse fungi, including P. stipitis, are consistently linked to the hypothetical L-rhamnose catabolic genes (Figure 1B and results recently published [16] while this work was in preparation), and whilst their function is as yet unknown they could be involved in regulating nearby genes
Summary
Various plant-derived substrates contain L-rhamnose that can be assimilated by many fungi and its liberation is catalyzed by α-L-rhamnosidases. In this regard, engineered fungal cells with enhanced rhamnosidase yields have been reported [6,7]. These enzymes are involved in the detoxification of plant secondary metabolites and they could play a role in evading plant defences against fungal attacks [8,9 and references therein]. In some instances optimizing the biosynthesis of α-L-rhamnosidases is useful whereas in other situations abolishing it is the preferable option To this end, detailed knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms underlying their production will help towards engineering improved fungal strains and/or process conditions
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.