Abstract
The most important remaining objection to my interpretation of Nietzsche's mature view of truth concerns its compatibility with his account of the ascetic ideal, in particular, with GM III's extended analysis of the faith in truth as the latest expression of the ascetic ideal. Walter Kaufmann defends Nietzsche as one who believed in truth by portraying him as a proponent of the ascetic ideal (1974, 245, 359–61; 1968a, esp. 584 ff.) Because I argue (in sections 1 and 2 of this chapter) that Nietzsche opposed all versions of the ascetic ideal, I must find some other way of reconciling his analysis of the faith in truth with my claim that he accepts the existence of truth. Quite apart from the defense it provides of the interpretation I have already given, my account of Nietzsche's analysis of the ascetic ideal plays a central role in this study. It takes us beyond the arguments I have already given to Nietzsche's ultimate reason for rejecting the metaphysical correspondence theory – not simply that it involves an internal contradiction (which I have argued he thinks it does), but that it reflects and is used to support an ideal he opposes and considers dangerous. It thereby gives Nietzsche's explanation for how it is that so many brilliant philosophers have found themselves bewitched by what he considers nonsense (section 3).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
