Abstract

This article examines the methodology and thinking behind Arts Council England's “Arts Debate”, a public value inquiry conducted from October 2006 to September 2007. It considers the ways in which methodology might have been shaped by the current discourse of public value, examines the different stages of the debate, and asks how the findings might inform future policy and research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call