7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
7-days of FREE Audio papers, translation & more with Prime
7-days of FREE Prime access
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693785
Copy DOIJournal: SSRN Electronic Journal | Publication Date: Jan 1, 2020 |
The aim of this article is to point to a flaw in one of the measures recently enacted by the New Zealand Government to prevent tax avoidance by large multinational enterprises (MNEs). That measure is section GB 54 of the Income Tax Act 2007, which was added to the Act in July 2018 and which is aimed at what is referred to as “the artificial avoidance of permanent establishment status”. The problem with section GB 54 is that it seems to be a nullity, in the sense that it does not catch anything that would not in any event be caught by section BG 1, the general anti-avoidance rule or GAAR. But it is also possible that the courts, in order to salvage section GB 54 from complete redundancy, will read down the scope of the GAAR. Perversely, therefore, the enactment of s GB 54, intended to prevent one particular form of tax avoidance, might make it easier to get away with others.
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.