Abstract

Louis Marshall and Stephen S. Wise are, in many ways, a study in contrasts. They were dissimilar in character, temperament, and even appearance as to seem natural antagonists. Marshall was born in Syracuse, New York, a decade prior to the Civil War. A product of the German-speaking Jewish immigrant milieu, he was short and rotund, with an intense gaze, a penetrating intellect, and a distinct preference for congress gaiters, brass-collar buttons, and bowties. Marshall was by nature an autodidact—in addition to English and German, he mastered French, Latin, Greek, and eventually Yiddish. He was also an excellent strategist and knew how to get things done. Wise was born in Budapest, Hungary, in the era of the Italian Risorgimento and the unification of Germany. He was brought to the United States as a small child. Pos sessed of a warm and gregarious nature, he was reared in a traditional German household his life was shaped early on by the fast-paced, cosmopolitan, English-speaking environment of New York City. Tall and handsome, sporting a thick mane of dark hair and his signature Prince Albert coat, he had a talent for being at the center of the action. A man of deep intelligence, Wise was an extraordinary orator, a natural politi cian, and a master builder of institutions. Marshall and Wise despised one another. Marshall's capacity for in vective was astounding, recalled his son, James, but there were limits on this, too, and . . . when ladies and children were present, he would splutter, 'He's a, he's a—So in the family quite a number of persons became known as 'Heezas.' The best known Heezas were Theodore Roosevelt and Stephen Wise.1 For his part, Wise late in life described Marshall as so much of a master or dictator of New York City's Temple Emanu-El, Reform's eastern flagship in the early twentieth century, the congregation virtually live[d] under Marshall law. What especially troubled Wise, he wrote, were not the differences between them, which surfaced quite dramatically in an early public clash over the Emanu-El ministry, rather that Mr. Marshall should have been willing to

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.