Abstract
The definition of the Argyll Robertson pupil is usually given as a condition in which the pupil does not respond to light but does respond in accommodation and convergence. There are those who hold that the light reflex must be entirely abolished and who do not recognize this phenomenon if any light reaction is preserved. While this may conform to the conception attributed to Argyll Robertson, it is a source of error. It must be assumed that the loss of the light reflex has been complete from the beginning, and this would imply an abrupt onset of the symptoms. In this method of reasoning, all preliminary stages to the production of an Argyll Robertson pupil are ignored. It is sometimes stated in an ophthalmologic report that the pupil does not respond to light, but does respond in accommodation and convergence without any reference to the manner in which the light
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.