Abstract

Arf6 and the Arf6 GTPase-activating protein (GAP) ACAP1 are established regulators of integrin traffic important to cell adhesion and migration. However, the function of Arf6 with ACAP1 cannot explain the range of Arf6 effects on integrin-based structures. We propose that Arf6 has different functions determined, in part, by the associated Arf GAP. We tested this idea by comparing the Arf6 GAPs ARAP2 and ACAP1. We found that ARAP2 and ACAP1 had opposing effects on apparent integrin β1 internalization. ARAP2 knockdown slowed, whereas ACAP1 knockdown accelerated, integrin β1 internalization. Integrin β1 association with adaptor protein containing a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, phosphotyrosine-binding (PTB) domain, and leucine zipper motif (APPL)-positive endosomes and EEA1-positive endosomes was affected by ARAP2 knockdown and depended on ARAP2 GAP activity. ARAP2 formed a complex with APPL1 and colocalized with Arf6 and APPL in a compartment distinct from the Arf6/ACAP1 tubular recycling endosome. In addition, although ACAP1 and ARAP2 each colocalized with Arf6, they did not colocalize with each other and had opposing effects on focal adhesions (FAs). ARAP2 overexpression promoted large FAs, but ACAP1 overexpression reduced FAs. Taken together, the data support a model in which Arf6 has at least two sites of opposing action defined by distinct Arf6 GAPs.

Highlights

  • Arf6 has a number of distinct effects on trafficking of integrins

  • We found that ARAP2 and ACAP1 had opposing effects on apparent integrin ␤1 internalization

  • In an initial test of this idea, we compared the effect of ACAP1 and ARAP2 knockdown on the net internalization rate of integrin ␤1, examined for 30 min

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Results: Two Arf GAPs, ARAP2 and ACAP1, were distinctly localized and had differential effects on integrin trafficking and integrin adhesions. Arf and the Arf GTPase-activating protein (GAP) ACAP1 are established regulators of integrin traffic important to cell adhesion and migration. We propose that Arf has different functions determined, in part, by the associated Arf GAP We tested this idea by comparing the Arf GAPs ARAP2 and ACAP1. We found that ARAP2 and ACAP1 had opposing effects on apparent integrin ␤1 internalization. ACAP1 and ARAP2 each colocalized with Arf, they did not colocalize with each other and had opposing effects on focal adhesions (FAs). ARAP2 overexpression promoted large FAs, but ACAP1 overexpression reduced FAs. Taken together, the data support a model in which Arf has at least two sites of opposing action defined by distinct Arf GAPs

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call