Abstract
This essay argues that (post)colonial cities are often studies in what Anthony Vidler calls the ‘architectural uncanny’. Imperial powers use mapping, building and urban design projects literally to shift the ground beneath natives' feet – a strategy that makes familiar ground seem uncannily foreign. The essay takes Belfast as a case study, tracing significant elements of the British design programme in the city from the seventeenth century onwards and connecting these elements to the segregated, sectarianized geography of the contemporary (post-)conflict city. However, far from ascribing absolute power to this ‘unhomely’ landscape, this essay examines the ways in which architectural space enables structures of both subjection and subversion. It reads the work of writers Ciaran Carson and Glenn Patterson for insubordinate spatial practices, practices that refute architectural authority by salvaging unpredictability, even play, for local pedestrians. These subterranean navigational tactics allow natives to re-route and re-root, at least in part, in their uncanny city.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
