Abstract
Objective:To summarize different results of suppression head impulse paradigm (SHIMP) and head impulse paradigm (HIMP) in patients with bilateral and unilateral vestibular loss and to evaluate the practicability of SHIMP in clinical vestibular examination. Method: Seventy subjects with unilateral vestibular loss, bilateral vestibular loss and healthy were included. Morphological characteristics of HIMP and SHIMP results were analyzed. The differences of VOR gains were compared with the paired t test. Result: Almost all SHIMP showed anti-compensatory saccades in healthy group. Less anti-compensatory saccades occurred in the affected side of patient with vestibular loss. The VOR gains showed there was a significant correlation(P<0.05) between HIMP and SHIMP. Conclusion: Different to compensatory saccades in HIMP indicate potential loss in vestibular function, anti-compensatory saccades in SHIMP shows vestibular function in patients. The combination of these two mthods will benefit disease screening and vestibular rehabilitation in clinical examination.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology, head, and neck surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
