Abstract

The Charter codifies and reaffirms the rights and principles recognised in the EU law. These rights and principles result from the constitutional traditions common to the Member States, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the European Court of Human Rights. The Charter was meant to strengthen the protection of fundamental rights by making those rights more visible. These aims determine the scope of applicability of the Charter and the rules of its interpretation and application in the law of the EU and the Member States. This chapter explores the restrictions of the applicability of the Charter (including its applicability towards the Member States and the possibility to apply the Charter in the horizontal relations). It will analyse the different modes, ways and constraints of the Charter's application and interpretation by the courts of the Member States. It also examines whether the Charter, despite its limited scope of application provided by art 51, can provide wider hints to national courts in the applying the fundamental rights. This contribution analyses also what are the consequences of the distinction between rights and principles as introduced in the Charter for the application and interpretation of the Charter. To answer these questions, the chapter will analyse the origin of the fundamental right protection in the EU law and the objectives, provisions and functioning of the Charter seen in the light of the principles of the EU law and the case-law of the Court of Justice.

Highlights

  • Charter of Fundamental Rights, judicial interactions, rights and principles, scope of application of the Charter, notion of implementation of EU law, competences of national courts, national constitutional standards, relations between EU and national law

  • National courts examine the compliance of national law with the fundamental rights recognised in the EU system. This competence was confirmed in the Åkerberg Fransson judgment, in which the CJEU precluded application of national procedural rules on reviewing the compliance of domestic law with fundamental rights. It held that Swedish law could not make application of the Charter conditional on whether incompatibility with fundamental rights was manifest, “since it withholds from the national court the power to assess fully, with, as the case may be, the cooperation of the Court of Justice of the European Union, whether that provision is compatible with the Charter.”[75]. That was directly confirmed in the A v B judgment concerning the Austrian legal system, in which the CJEU stated that the ordinary courts might not be under a duty to apply to the constitutional court for statutes to be annulled with erga omnes effect if that obligation prevented the courts from exercising their right to make a reference to the CJEU

  • National courts can indirectly derive from the Charter certain extended or even new competences of constitutional review, which can be enforced without the intervention of constitutional or higher courts and which may lead to substantial changes in the interpretation and application of national standards of fundamental rights protection

Read more

Summary

Preliminary remarks*

The Charter is about people and their rights. As is stated in its preamble, the EU places the individual at the heart of its activities and contributes to the preservation and development of common values. More than 10 years after its entry into force as a binding legal act the Charter has proved to be a milestone in the development of the legal systems of the EU and its Member States It has become an important part of EU and national jurisprudence – does the CJEU invoke its provisions and use them as a legal basis for its decisions but the same is true of national courts. It has not been possible to avoid interactions between the national constitutional orders and the Charter These interactions may be positive in the sense of the cross-fertilisation or cross influence, resulting in establishing the common standard of protection of the fundamental rights. The Charter, which was initially seen as a legal instrument serving the EU and making the EU fundamental rights more visible, more than ever can protect and support the constitutional values of the Member States

Rights and principles in the Charter
Question of interpretation of Article 51(1) of the Charter
Direct implementation of EU law
Indirect implementation of EU law
The given case falls under EU law
The scope of EU law
Competences of national judges deriving from the Charter
Diverging EU and national standards of protection of fundamental rights
Consistent EU and national standards
Applicability and application of the Charter
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.