Abstract
Abstract Over the years, the Pilot Judgment Procedure has become a common element of the Strasbourg landscape. Since the first pilot judgment in the case of Broniowski v. Poland in 2004, the procedure is now a well-recognised mechanism for solving systemic and structural problems. Nevertheless, it is not the only measure of solving large-scale dysfunctions arising from the legal systems of States Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights. The European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) has developed several mechanisms designed to eradicate systemic and structural problems, such as: Quasi-Pilot Judgments, Third Tier Judgments, Simplified Committee Procedure, Grouped Judgments, Joined Judgments, Judgments of Principle, and other methods, concerning mostly effective “Case-Management”. This article presents and analyses these methods used by the ECrtHR in order to eliminate structural and systemic problems and dysfunctions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
