Abstract
This article discusses the acknowledged gap that exists between educational research and practice, specifically the limited relevance of the former for the latter. The author describes, illustrates, and advocates the multiple baseline, single-subject research method as an approach that produces applicable results. — G.M.S. Arguments are presented suggesting that single-subject research designs can form a basis for establishing a working relationship between researchers and clinicians. At the heart of the arguments is an emphasis on focusing activities at the level of the individual child. Issues regarding variability, generality, sampling, and the “believability” of multiple-baseline single-subject designs are discussed from the researcher's perspective. The potential benefits of such a relationship to the clinician as well as to the learning disabilities field in general are also explored.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.