Abstract

Human identification of unknown samples following disaster and mass casualty events is essential, especially to bring closure to family and friends of the deceased. Unfortunately, victim identification is often challenging for forensic investigators as analysis becomes complicated when biological samples are degraded or of poor quality as a result of exposure to harsh environmental factors. Mitochondrial DNA becomes the ideal option for analysis, particularly for determining the origin of the samples. In such events, the estimation of genetic parameters plays an important role in modelling and predicting genetic relatedness and is useful in assigning unknown individuals to an ethnic group. Various techniques exist for the estimation of genetic relatedness, but the use of Machine learning (ML) algorithms are novel and presently the least used in forensic genetic studies. In this study, we investigated the ability of ML algorithms to predict genetic relatedness using hypervariable region I sequences; that were retrieved from the GenBank database for three race groups, namely African, Asian and Caucasian. Four ML classification algorithms; Support vector machines (SVM), Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) and Random Forest (RF) were hybridised with one-hot encoding, Principal component analysis (PCA) and Bags of Words (BoW), and were compared for inferring genetic relatedness. The findings from this study on WEKA showed that genetic inferences based on PCA-SVM achieved an overall accuracy of 80–90% and consistently outperformed PCA-LDA, PCA-RF and PCA-QDA, while in Python BoW-PCA-RF achieved 94.4% accuracy which outperformed BoW-PCA-SVM, BoW-PCA-LDA and BoW-PCA-QDA respectively. ML results from the use of WEKA and Python software tools displayed higher accuracies as compared to the Analysis of molecular variance results. Given the results, SVM and RF algorithms are likely to also be useful in other sequence classification applications, making it a promising tool in genetics and forensic science. The study provides evidence that ML can be utilized as a supplementary tool for forensic genetics casework analysis.

Highlights

  • In forensic studies, human identification is achieved through genetic profiles [1]

  • 2.79% of the variation occurred among race groups (African, Asian and Caucasian)

  • The results showed that Principal component analysis (PCA)-Support vector machines (SVM) in Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) and Bags of Words (BoW)-PCA-Random Forest (RF) in Python are the most robust and accurate classifiers among compared Machine learning (ML) algorithms with the best accuracies of 94.35% and 100%, respectively in determining genetic relatedness and modelling genetic inferences in such that it was able to classify unknown samples into race groups and infer population allocation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In forensic studies, human identification is achieved through genetic profiles [1]. Over the years, genetic profile determination has largely depended on autosomal Short Tandem Repeats (STRs). Autosomal DNA usually degrades and sometimes or not always is available in forensic settings To alleviate such setbacks, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been applied as a marker for human identification. Within the mtDNA genome, hypervariable regions I and II (HVR I and HVR II) located in the control region are highly polymorphic and contain the highest levels of variations making them suitable for identification purposes [1]. This makes the region amenable for inferring genetic differentiation using analytical tools.

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call