Abstract
Objective To evaluate the security and feasibility of the use of LMA in interventional embolization therapy of cerebral aneurysm and compare with endotracheal intubation. Methods Eighty ASA Ⅰ -Ⅱ patients aged 22-65 y undergoing elective cerebral aneurysm embolization were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized to receive either LMA (group L,n=40) or endotracheal intubator(group T, n=40). Hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored during anesthesia induction, operation and anesthesia recovery. The time to recovery, eyes opening and extubation were recorded. Whether coughing, restlessness, nausea and the incidences of body movement(9), coughing (4),nausea and vomiting(4) and sore throat (7) of group T were much higher(P＜response and is more suitable for interventional cerebral aneurysm embolizaiton. Key words: Laryngeal mask airway; General anesthesia; Cerebral aneurysm; Interventional embolization
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
