The application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analyses of cohort studies

Echocardiographic Image of a Cannula in the Inferior Vena Cava After Decannulation of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

What is New in ECMO for COVID-19?

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with SARS-CoV-2

The Right Ventricle in COVID-19 Lung Injury: Proposed Mechanisms, Management, and Research Gaps

A traveling team concept to expedite the transfer and management of unstable patients in cardiopulmonary shock

Long-Term Outcomes Are Important: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19

Evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with influenza A (H7N9) has been was limited to case reports. Our study is aimed to investigate the current application, efficacy and safety of ECMO in for severe H7N9 pneumonia-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the Chinese population. A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted at 20 hospitals that admitted patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) viral pneumonia patients’ admission from 9 provinces in China between October 1, 2016, and March 1, 2017. Data from the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, including general conditions, outcomes and ECMO management, were analysed. Then, successfully weaned and unsuccessfully weaned groups were compared. A total of 35 patients, aged 57 ± 1 years, were analysed; 65.7% of patients were male with 63% mortality. All patients underwent invasive positive pressure ventilation (IPPV), and rescue ventilation strategies were implemented for 23 cases (65.7%) with an average IPPV duration of 5 ± 1 d, PaO2/FiO2 of 78 ± 23 mmHg, tidal volume (VT) of 439 ± 61 ml and plateau pressure (Pplat) of 29 ± 8 cmH2O pre-ECMO. After 48 h on ECMO, PaO2 improved from 56 ± 21 mmHg to 90 ± 24 mmHg and PaCO2 declined from 52 ± 24 mmHg to 38 ± 24 mmHg. Haemorrhage, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and barotrauma occurred in 45.7%, 60% and 8.6% of patients, respectively. Compared with successfully weaned patients (n = 14), the 21 unsuccessfully weaned patients had a longer duration of IPPV pre-ECMO (6 ± 4 d vs. 2 ± 1 d, P < 0.01) as well as a higher Pplat (25 ± 5 cmH2O vs. 21 ± 3 cmH2O, P < 0.05) and VT (343 ± 96 ml vs. 246 ± 93 ml, P < 0.05) after 48 h on ECMO support. Furthermore, the unsuccessfully weaned group had a higher mortality (100% vs. 7.1%, P < 0.01) with more haemorrhage (77.3% vs. 28.6%, P < 0.01). ECMO is effective at improving oxygenation and ventilation of patients with avian influenza A (H7N9) induced severe ARDS. Early initiation of ECMO with appropriate IPPV settings and anticoagulation strategies are necessary to reduce complications.

Objective: To investigate the application effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) after kidney transplantation.Methods: This is a case series on 10 kidney transplant recipients with severe ARDS caused by PJP at the People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou, who were enrolled as the case group. A total of 17 cases of PJP diagnosed with severe ARDS without ECMO were selected as the control group. The timing and mode of ECMO support and treatment complications were summarized. The primary aim of this study was mortality and secondary was imaging and complications.Results: The enrolled patients’ oxygenation index before the start of ECMO ranged from 25 to 92, and the time from admission to the start of ECMO was 1–17 days, with an average of 5.56 days. In the case group, one patient died of hemorrhagic shock due to abdominal hemorrhage, but the other nine patients were successfully weaned from ECMO. Of these patients, one died due to sepsis following weaning. The survival rate in the case group was 80.0% (8/10), and the survival rate in the control group was 35.29% (6/17). The vein–vein ECMO support time in the nine successfully weaned patients in the case group ranged from 131 to 288 h, with an average of 215.5 h. Of the eight patients who survived, deterioration of renal function after transplantation occurred in two patients, but no fatal complications occurred.Conclusion: Overall, Patients with severe ARDS caused by postoperative PJP infection following kidney transplantation have a poor prognosis. The mortality was lower in patients who were treated with ECMO compared to standard care.

To the Editor: We read with great interest the clinical investigation reported by Yang et al (1) published in a recent issue of Critical Care Medicine. The authors describe the characteristics of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) induced by the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). They reported the mortality rate of COVID-19-induced ARDS requiring ECMO as 57.1%, which is similar to the 58.3% reported for outcomes (death or coma) in another case series (2). They also described the timing of initiation and the initial settings of ECMO in patients with severe ARDS induced by COVID-19. We would like to discuss whether the strategy they reported can be considered as standard for ECMO treatment for severe COVID-19 pneumonia. First, regarding the timing of initiating ECMO, the authors state that earlier initiation after mechanical ventilation may be associated with improved outcomes. Although early initiation is reported to be associated with good prognosis in adult ARDS patients (3), COVID-19 pneumonia is reported to present with features different from typical ARDS (4). Would different phenotypes of respiratory failure require different ECMO treatment strategies? We are still doubtful whether early initiation of ECMO can be considered similarly for typical ARDS and COVID-19 pneumonia. Addressing this will require comparisons between early initiation and late initiation groups. Second, the initial setting of ECMO in the study by Yang et al (1) seems to be unique. The authors report that many patients developed bradycardia while the centrifugal pump was on. This raises the question of whether this phenomenon is unique to COVID-19 pneumonia. Looking at the many COVID-19 case series reported to date, we find no descriptions of bradycardia elsewhere. To avoid bradycardia, the authors suggest increasing ECMO pump rotation slowly from 1,500 revolutions per minute (rpm) to the target rotation at increments of 500 rpm every 10 minutes. We speculate venovenous ECMO does not, in fact, have a significant effect on hemodynamics when initiating ECMO as long as a sufficient intravascular volume is maintained. Another report of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring ECMO also described gradually increasing the rotation speed of the centrifugal pump when starting ECMO (5), but at a seemingly faster rate than Yang et al (1) reported. We question then whether it is actually possible to prevent bradycardia using the authors’ method. Finally, have the laboratory test values presented for survivors and nonsurvivors in Table 2 in (1) mistakenly been switched, given that the authors state that “survivors had a significant lower creatinine than nonsurvivors prior to ECMO”; the numbers in Table 2 in (1) are reversed. We are still in the pandemic phase of COVID-19, and thus, appropriate indications and methods for initiating ECMO support in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia are important to establish.

Use of ECMO in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: Does the Evidence Suffice?

Protecting the Injured Right Ventricle in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Can Clinicians Personalize Interventions and Reduce Mortality?

OBJECTIVES:To investigate the ICU survival of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients suffering from COVID-19–related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) versus ECMO patients without COVID-19 (non-COVID-19)–related ARDS.DESIGN:Preliminary analysis of data from two prospective ECMO trials and retrospective analysis of a cohort of ARDS ECMO patients.SETTING:Single-center ICU.PATIENTS:Adult ARDS ECMO patients, 16 COVID-19 versus 23 non-COVID-19 patients. Analysis of retrospective data from 346 adult ARDS ECMO patients.INTERVENTIONS:None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS patients did not differ with respect to preexisting disease or body mass index. ICU survival rate was 62% for COVID-19 ECMO patients and 70% for non-COVID-19 ECMO patients. COVID-19 ECMO survivors were supported with ECMO for a median of 43 days (interquartile range [IQR], 18–58 d) versus 16 days (IQR, 19–39 d; p = 0.03) for non-COVID-19 patients. The median duration of ECMO therapy for all ARDS patients between 2007 and 2018 was 15 days (IQR, 6–28 d). The subgroup of patients suffering from any viral pneumonia received ECMO support for a median of 16 days (IQR, 9–27 d), survivors of influenza pneumonia received ECMO support for 13 days (IQR, 7–25 d).CONCLUSIONS:COVID-19 patients required significant longer ECMO support compared with patients without COVID-19 to achieve successful ECMO weaning and ICU survival.

Objective: To analyze the clinical effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the treatment of burn patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: The retrospective observational study and the systematic review were applied. From March 2014 to July 2020, five burn patients with ARDS received ECMO treatment in the First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University (the Third Military Medical University). All the five patients were male, aged from 40 to 62 years. The average total burn surface area was 58.8% total body surface area (TBSA) and four cases had severe inhalation injury. Patient's ECMO starting time, duration and mode, and whether successfully weaned or the cause of death, and others. were recorded. Furthermore, the changes of oxygenation and infection before, during, and after utilizing ECMO were analyzed. PubMed and Web of Science from the establishment of each database to August 2021 were searched using "Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation", "ECMO", "burn", "inhalation" as the search terms and "Title/Abstract" as the field to retrieve the clinical articles that meet the selection criteria . Basic information were extracted from the articles, including sample size, gender, age, total burn area, inhalation injury, the indication of ECMO, the start and lasting time of ECMO, ECMO mode, rate of successful weaning, complications of ECMO, mortality, the combined application of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Results: Five patients started venovenous ECMO on an average of 10.2 days after injury and lasted an average of 180.4 hours. Three out of 5 patients were weaned successfully with one patient survived. Four patients died of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and septic shock. Compared with those before ECMO treatment, the arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and oxygen saturation in arterial blood (SaO2) of three successfully weaned patients obviously increased during and after ECMO treatment. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) decreased below 50% and PaO2/FiO2 ratio increased above 200 mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) during and after ECMO. Furthermore, lactic acid and respiratory rate decreased, basically. Compared with those before ECMO, PaO2 and SaO2 in the other two patients during ECMO, who failed to be weaned, continuously decreased while lactic acid increased. Before and during ECMO, the PaO2/FiO2 ratios of unsuccessfullg weaned cases were less than 200 mmHg, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) were more than 40 mmHg. Compared with those before ECMO, there were no significant changes in body temperature during and after ECMO, which were less than 38 ℃. Compared with those before ECMO, the leucocyte number (the index without this in unsuccessfully weaned cases was omitted, the same as below) in four patients showed a significant decrease during ECMO, but rose after removal of ECMO. The proportion of neutrophils in three patients were slightly higher during ECMO than before ECMO, and did not change significantly after removal of ECMO. Compared with those before ECMO, platelet counts in three patients were significantly reduced during ECMO, and all five patients during ECMO were below normal levels. Compared with those before ECMO, the procalcitonin levels in four deaths were significantly increased during ECMO. Catheter culture of microorganism was performed in three successfully weaned patients, all of which were negative. A total of 13 literature were included, ranging from 1990 to 2019. The sample size in 6 studies was less than 10, and the sample size in 4 studies was between 10 and 20, and only 2 literatures had a sample size larger than 50. ECMO was applied in 295 burn patients with overall mortality of 48.8% (144/295), including 157 adults and 138 children. The most common indication of ECMO was severe ARDS. Among 157 adult burn patients (95 males and 65 females), 36 cases had inhalation injury. The average burn area was 27%-37%TBSA in 5 reported studies and was more than 50%TBSA in 2 reported studies. The most common mode was venovenous ECMO. ECMO treatment began 26.5 hours to 7.4 days after injury and lasted from 90 hours to 18 days, and the rate of successful weaning ranged from 50% to 100%. The most common complications were bleeding and infection. The mortality was 52.9% (83/157). MODS and sepsis were the leading causes of death. Among 138 pediatric burn patients (77 boys and 61 girls), 29 patients had inhalation injury. The average burn area was 17%-50.2%TBSA in 3 studies. ECMO treatment lasted from 165.2 hours to 324.4 hours. Bleeding was the most common complication. The mortality was 44.2% (61/138). Conclusions: ECMO is an effective strategy for the salvage treatment of burns complicated with ARDS. Furthermore, the prevention and treatment of bleeding, infection and organ dysfunction should be emphasized during the use of ECMO. More importantly, evidence-based guidelines for burns are urgently needed to further improve the clinical effect of ECMO.

Long-term recovery of survivors of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: The next imperative

Veno-Pulmonary Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Should We Consider Mechanical Support of the Pulmonary Circulation From the Outset?