The application of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography in solitary pulmonary nodule identification.

Abstract

Differentiating between malignant solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) and other lung diseases remains a substantial challenge. The latest generation of dual-energy computed tomography (CT), which realizes dual-energy technology at the detector level, has clinical potential for distinguishing lung cancer from other benign SPNs. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of dual-layer spectral detector CT (SDCT) for the differentiation of SPNs. Spectral images of 135 SPNs confirmed by pathology were retrospectively analyzed in both the arterial phase (AP) and the venous phase (VP). Patients were classified into two groups [the malignant group (n=93) and the benign group (n=42)], with the malignant group further divided into small cell lung cancer (SCLC, n=30) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC, n=63) subtypes. The slope of the spectral Hounsfield Unit (HU) curve (λHU), normalized iodine concentration (NIC), CT values of 40 keV monochromatic images (CT40keV), and normalized arterial enhancement fraction (NAEF) in contrast-enhanced images were calculated and compared between the benign and malignant groups, as well as between the SCLC and NSCLC subgroups. ROC curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of the above parameters. Seventy cases were randomly selected and independently measured by two radiologists, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to calculate the reliability of the measurements. Except for NAEF (P=0.23), the values of the parameters were higher in the malignant group than in the benign group (all P<0.05). NIC, λHU, and CT40keV performed better in the VP (NICVP, λVPHU, and CTVP40keV) (P<0.001), with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.93, 0.89, and 0.89 respectively. With respective cutoffs of 0.31, 1.83, and 141.00 HU, the accuracy of NICVP, λVPHU, and CTVP40keV was 91.11%, 85.19%, and 88.15%, respectively. In the subgroup differentiating NSCLC and SCLC, the diagnostic performances of NICAP (AUC =0.89) were greater than other parameters. NICAP had an accuracy of 86.02% when the cutoff was 0.14. ICC and Bland-Altman analyses indicated that the measurement of SDCT has great reproducibility. Quantitative measures from SDCT can help to differentiate benign from malignant SPNs and may help with the further subclassification of malignant cancer into SCLC and NSCLC.