Abstract

The two-parameter critical power (CP) model is a robust mathematical interpretation of the power–duration relationship, with CP being the rate associated with the maximal aerobic steady state, and W′ the fixed amount of tolerable work above CP available without any recovery. The aim of this narrative review is to describe the CP concept and the methodologies used to assess it, and to summarize the research applying it to intermittent cycle training techniques. CP and W′ are traditionally assessed using a number of constant work rate cycling tests spread over several days. Alternatively, both the 3-min all-out and ramp all-out protocols provide valid measurements of CP and W′ from a single test, thereby enhancing their suitability to athletes and likely reducing errors associated with the assumptions of the CP model. As CP represents the physiological landmark that is the boundary between heavy and severe intensity domains, it presents several advantages over the de facto arbitrarily defined functional threshold power as the basis for cycle training prescription at intensities up to CP. For intensities above CP, precise prescription is not possible based solely on aerobic measures; however, the addition of the W′ parameter does facilitate the prescription of individualized training intensities and durations within the severe intensity domain. Modelling of W′ reconstitution extends this application, although more research is needed to identify the individual parameters that govern W′ reconstitution rates and their kinetics.

Highlights

  • The concept was successfully applied to cycling [3] and, importantly, critical power (CP) was found to be highly correlated to the “anaerobic threshold”, whilst the sum of CP and the fixed energy reserve was highly correlated to maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max )

  • In this “severe intensity domain” VO2 continued to rise until VO2max was attained and exhaustion ensued, whilst “heavy intensity domain” exercise performed slightly below CP resulted in the attainment of a VO2 steady state without exhaustion

  • This study demonstrated that the longer the duration of the time to exhaustion (TTE) the greater the amount of work that could be performed in a subsequent 30 s effort, implying that the longer the TTE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Et al [4], provided further evidence that CP did represent a physiological threshold by demonstrating that intensities above CP did not evoke a VO2 steady state. In this “severe intensity domain” VO2 continued to rise until VO2max was attained and exhaustion ensued, whilst “heavy intensity domain” exercise performed slightly below CP resulted in the attainment of a VO2 steady state without exhaustion. Lactate turn-point [5], lactate threshold [6], onset of blood lactate accumulation [7], maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) [8], respiratory compensation point [9,10]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call